Challenging Idaho’s Ag-Gag Law
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. C. L. “Butch” Otter
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit in federal court against the state of Idaho, arguing its Ag-Gag law violates the U.S. Constitution.
January 4, 2018
Ninth Circuit Rules Audio, Visual Recording is protected
In 2012, an undercover investigator for Mercy for Animals filmed dairy workers in Idaho violently abusing cows. Idaho’s legislature responded by passing an Ag-Gag law that makes it a crime to conduct undercover agricultural investigations. Such laws — in effect in a handful of states—are designed to make it difficult for the public to learn about animal cruelty on farms.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund brought a lawsuit against Idaho in 2014, joined by a coalition of other nonprofits, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the Center for Food Safety, and the American Civil Liberties Union.
The lawsuit challenged Idaho’s Ag-Gag law as unconstitutional, and chronicled the important role undercover investigations have played through the years in bringing to light some of farming’s most abusive practices.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho was persuaded, and struck down the law as unconstitutional in 2015, finding it to violate both the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.
The state of Idaho appealed. In a landmark decision issued in 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit became the first federal “appellate” court to strike down provisions of an Ag-Gag law. The court held that Idaho’s ban on recording conditions at factory farms and slaughterhouses violates the First Amendment.
The court did allow two sections of the Ag-Gag law to stand: One that makes it a crime to obtain an agricultural production facility’s records by misrepresentation, and another making it a crime to get a job at an agricultural facility through misrepresentation if one’s purpose is also to cause the farm economic harm. These two sections were both narrowly construed by the court.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund continues to mount legal challenges in other states with Ag-Gag laws.
Stop Ag-Gag Laws
Undercover investigations and whistleblowers have exposed some of the worst aspects of factory farming, but Ag-Gag laws punish people who speak out about cruelty in animal agriculture. Voice your opposition.
Stop Animal Cruelty
Every day, animals are abused and killed. Their abusers frequently do not face any consequences – it’s still extremely common for animal cruelty to go unpunished. Without you, animals have no voice. Sign the petition.
You Can Protect Animals
Since 1979, the Animal Legal Defense Fund has led the charge to win animals the legal protection they so desperately need—and deserve. Your generous gift will assure that we can continue to take on cases that advance the interests of animals.
Fourth Circuit Enjoins North Carolina Ag-Gag Law
Fourth Circuit Enjoins North Carolina Ag-Gag LawThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit handed an important win to plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging North Carolina’s Ag-Gag law, ruling that undercover investigations and whistleblowing are considered newsgathering activities protected by the First Amendment.February 23, 2023 Press Release
Animal Legal Defense Fund Will Seek Justice for Abused Horse in Oregon’s Highest CourtFollowing the dismissal of Justice’s case upheld on appeal, the Animal Legal Defense Fund continues to seek accountability under the law.September 1, 2022 Press Release
Court Rules Louisiana Label Censorship Law Unconstitutional After First Amendment Challenge from TofurkyMeat and dairy alternatives can use common naming conventions in the state without fear of prosecutionMarch 29, 2022 Press Release
Challenging Utah’s Ag-Gag Law
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Gary Herbert
Challenging Iowa’s Ag-Gag Law
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Kimberly K. Reynolds
Challenging Kansas’s Ag-Gag Law
Animal Legal Defense Fund et. al. v. Kelly et. al.
Looking for case and legal resources? View ResourcesSee More