Litigation
Filing High Impact Lawsuits that Expand the Protections for Animals Under the Law
The Litigation Program files high-impact lawsuits against individuals and industries that exploit animals, including factory farms, puppy mills, research laboratories, and roadside zoos. We litigate cases in state and federal courts with the goal of stopping abusive practices and setting ground-breaking precedent that will establish justice for animals in the legal system. In addition to suing animal abusers, we often sue state and federal governments and agencies to invalidate laws and regulations that harm animals; and we intervene in litigation to defend animal protection laws when they are under siege from industries that abuse animals.
Featured Cases
Defending California’s Proposition 12 Against Iowa Industry Group’s Challenge
Justice the Horse Sues Abuser
Recent Victories
Challenging Kansas’s Ag-Gag Law
Challenging Cricket Hollow Zoo’s Treatment of Animals (2018)
Challenging Backyard Butchers in Florida
Challenging the Sale of Puppy Mill Dogs – Barkworks Class Action
Litigation Program Team
See bar admissions of our attorneys.
-
Anthony Eliseuson
Litigation Program Director -
Amanda Howell
Managing Attorney -
Ariel Flint
Senior Staff Attorney -
Bailey Frank
David Reuben Litigation Fellow -
Caitlin Foley
Senior Staff Attorney -
Christine Ball-Blakely
Senior Staff Attorney -
Cristina Kladis
Staff Attorney -
Daniel Waltz
Managing Attorney -
Emily Stewart
Litigation Fellow -
Emma McCapes
Litigation Coordinator -
Larissa Liebmann
Senior Staff Attorney -
Michael Swistara
Litigation Fellow -
Sam Fox Krauss
Litigation Fellow -
Sarah Rogers
Staff Attorney
Related News
-
Tyson Foods Sued Over Deceptive ‘Net-Zero’ and ‘Climate-Smart’ Beef Claims
Environmental group accuses Tyson of capitalizing on consumers’ interest in purchasing climate-friendly foods by falsely claiming it will be net-zero by 2050 and marketing its industrial beef products as “climate-smart”September 18, 2024 News -
Opposing Wisconsin’s Unconstitutional Hunter Protection Laws: Discussion and Analysis
Join us for a discussion of “hunter protection” laws and the groundbreaking Wisconsin case, Brown v. Kemp, that outlined how these laws violate the First Amendment rights of citizens who care about wolf and other wild animal populations. -
Federal Court Rules Government Censorship of Animal Advocates’ Speech on Social Media is Unconstitutional
The victory for free speech online follows a lawsuit against the National Institutes of HealthJuly 30, 2024 News