Protecting Pigs from Cruel High-Speed Slaughter
Farm Sanctuary v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
The Animal Legal Defense Fund joined a coalition in suing the U.S Department of Agriculture for issuing a final rule allowing pig slaughterhouses nationwide to police themselves and kill pigs at very high line speeds.
Lawsuit filed December 18, 2019
Government reply in support of motion to dismiss due
On Dec. 18, 2019, the Animal Legal Defense Fund, with a coalition of environmental and animal protection groups, filed a lawsuit against the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) for issuing a final rule allowing pig slaughterhouses nationwide to police themselves and kill pigs at very high line speeds — leaving millions of pigs vulnerable to increased suffering and terror.
The Modernization of Pork Slaughter rule, finalized in October 2019, expands a problematic pilot program that allowed five of the nation’s largest pig slaughterhouses to increase the speed at which pigs are slaughtered. The swine Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point-based Inspection Models Project (HIMP) program began in 1997 — and, since its inception, has been widely criticized by watchdog groups, former USDA food safety inspectors, and even the USDA’s own Office of Inspector General.
Previously, slaughterhouses were capped at killing 1,106 pigs per hour. The Modernization of Pork Slaughter rule lifts that speed limit, allowing slaughterhouses to kill even more pigs even more quickly.
While the largest meat companies stand to profit, the Modernization of Pork Slaughter rule increases pigs’ suffering, threatens consumer and worker safety, and poses serious environmental risks — in contravention of federal law.
The lawsuit was filed with Farm Sanctuary, Animal Equality, the Center for Biological Diversity, Compassion Over Killing, Mercy For Animals, and North Carolina Farmed Animal Save. The plaintiffs are represented by Lewis & Clark Law School’s Animal Law Litigation Clinic.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? The U.S. Department of Agriculture, for violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Federal Meat Inspection Act, Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Why this case is important: The factory farming and slaughter industry requires more oversight, not less. Millions of pigs will suffer because of the new high-speed pig slaughter rule. Consumers are also endangered by high slaughtering speeds, as the rule slashes government inspectors and re-assigns critical inspection responsibilities to untrained slaughterhouse workers. Slaughterhouse workers are also put at risk, with the National Council for Occupational Safety and Health warning the faster processing speeds will lead to an increase in workplace injuries. Pollution from noxious slaughterhouses and factory farms is another serious concern.
Together with the coalition, the Animal Legal Defense Fund is committed to fighting the high-speed pig slaughter rule in court.
HF 775 is aimed at criminalizing whistleblowing and undercover investigations in agricultural facilities, thus “gagging” activists and others who expose animal abuse in factory farms and slaughterhouses.April 12, 2021 Action Alert
New White Paper Offers Policy Recommendations to Combat Zoonotic Diseases and Pandemic Risk from Factory FarmingThe Animal Legal Defense Fund released the second in a series of white papers — COVID-19 and Factory Farming —providing policy recommendations to address industrial animal agriculture’s role in our heightened risk for zoonotic diseases outbreaks, like COVID-19, and its potential to be the source of the next global pandemic.November 19, 2020 Press Release
Though Craigslist has officially banned the sale of animals, animals are routinely sold on its platform. Farmed animals including pigs to dogs and cats to lizards and snakes continue to be advertised and purchased on Craigslist under the guise of “re-homing.”
Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement v. Council on Environmental Quality
Cape Fear River Watch v. Environmental Protection Agency
Public Justice Foundation v. Farm Service Agency