Petition to Food & Drug Administration to Regulate Ractopamine Use
Petition to the FDA submitted in 2012
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a petition with the FDA calling for the immediate reduction in the allowable levels of ractopamine in animal feed.
In 2012, the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) calling for the immediate reduction in the allowable levels of ractopamine, the controversial animal feed additive widely used in industrial factory farms that raises significant food safety and animal welfare concerns for the U.S. meat industry.
The petition, filed with the Center for Food Safety, also urged the FDA to conduct comprehensive studies on the long-term effects of human consumption, immediate health impact on animals, and a thorough review of international standards.
Ractopamine is used to accelerate weight gain and promote feed efficiency and leanness in animals raised for meat. In 2000, the FDA ruled that ractopamine was safe and approved it for use in feed for pigs; the agency later approved it for cattle and turkeys.
As with the vast majority of animal drugs used in the U.S. industrial meat system, the FDA’s approval for ractopamine relied primarily on safety studies conducted by the drug-maker, Elanco. A review of available evidence collected from FDA, the European Food Safety Authority, academic researchers, and even industry itself calls FDA’s determination of the drug’s safety into question.
Based on available evidence, many countries have taken a cautionary approach to the use of ractopamine in their national food systems. Currently, approximately 160 countries ban or restrict ractopamine, including all the nations of the European Union, China, Taiwan, and even Russia.
Earlier this year, a court ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release previously redacted information relating to hen living conditions on several factory egg farms. Our request sought inspection reports of factory egg farms in Texas.May 8, 2019 News
In an unpublished opinion issued December 20, 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a class action against Blue Diamond Growers. The lawsuit alleged that the company’s almond milk products were mislabeled under FDA law.February 25, 2019 Animal Law Update
This week the Animal Legal Defense Fund was joined by several nonprofit animal protection organizations in submitting comments urging the U.S. government not to bow to pressure from the factory farming industry in its regulation of slaughter-free meat.December 20, 2018 Press Release
Animal Legal Defense Fund v U.S. Food and Drug Administration
The Animal Legal Defense Fund urged the FDA to protect consumers from misleading “natural” claims on meat products.
Submitted Joint Comments