
Urging the FDA to Regulate the Term “Natural”
The Animal Legal Defense Fund urged the FDA to protect consumers from misleading “natural” claims on meat products.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund submitted comments to the FDA calling on the agency to work with the USDA to prevent consumer deception from meat products bearing misleading “natural” labeling claims.
Status
Next Step
Case Closed
In 2016, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Center for Biological Diversity jointly submitted comments to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) calling on the agency to work with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to properly regulate the use of the term “natural” in the labeling of meat and poultry products.
We recommended that the term be defined in a way that aligns with what consumers reasonably believe “natural” to mean when it comes to the care and raising of farmed animals.
The comments argued that, to prevent a likelihood of consumer confusion, the FDA must prohibit the use of the “natural” claim on meat and poultry product labels when those products come from animals raised in ways that are anything but natural: when they are fed sub-therapeutic doses of antibiotics or other veterinary drugs, injected with growth hormones, and confined without any outdoor access, in spaces that prevent the animals from performing natural behaviors.
In its comments the Animal Legal Defense Fund called out Hormel Foods’ Natural Choice lunch meat and bacon products’ “natural” claims as particularly deceptive, due to the manner in which the animals sourced for the products were raised and the products were produced.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund is pursuing a separate consumer protection lawsuit against Hormel regarding their Natural Choice advertisements.


No federal laws govern how farmed animals are raised and most state cruelty laws exempt standard agricultural practices.
Donate to Protect Animals
Help animals win the legal protections they so desperately need and deserve, and ensure they have an advocate in courtrooms and legislatures across the country.
Recent News
-
After Images of Employee’s Injury from Animal Attack Surface – OSHA Complaint Filed Against Texas Wild Animal Dealer and Roadside Zoo Owner
Graphic images of wound are posted on Tik-Tok by an employee of Gator Park — a facility owned and operated by Jason Clay.April 7, 2022 Press Release -
Lawsuit Filed Against Tiger Creek for Violating Endangered Species Act
The lawsuit alleges federally endangered and threatened animals such as the tigers, lions, and ring-tailed lemurs are receiving inadequate care at Tiger CreekMarch 16, 2022 Press Release -
Complaint Demands USDA Provide Oversight of Animal Exhibitors on Social Media Operating Without Licenses
The complaint asks the agency to enforce the Animal Welfare Act to protect animals exploited on social media platformsFebruary 2, 2022 Press Release
Related Cases
-
Challenging Hormel’s Deceptive Advertising Practices: Natural Choice®
Animal Legal Defense Fund v Hormel Foods Corporation
-
Exposing the Living Conditions of Hens Used by the Egg Industry
Matthew Hamity v California Department of Food and Agriculture
-
Seeking National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
USDA FOIA Request #FOIA-2015-00184
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See More