Hormel Sued for Deceptive & Misleading Advertising of So-called ‘Natural’ Products
Lawsuit accuses meat giant of advertising factory farmed meat as ‘natural’
Contact: Natalia Lima, email@example.com, 201 679 7088
Washington, DC – Today the Animal Legal Defense Fund, Public Justice, and the Richman Law Group filed a joint lawsuit in the District of Columbia Superior Court against Hormel Foods, alleging the company is misleading consumers through the advertising of its Natural Choice® brand of lunch meats and bacon.
Contrary to Hormel’s branding campaign, the suit alleges, meats the company advertises as “natural” actually comes from animals raised in the worst factory farms that employ additives, hormones and antibiotics, and contain ingredients that constitute artificial preservatives.
With the slogan “Make the Natural Choice®” and repeated claims that its Natural Choice® products are “100% Natural” and “All-Natural,” Hormel Foods has run a wide-ranging advertising campaign that takes advantage of consumers’ beliefs that “natural” meat comes from animals raised in a specific, sustainable way.
According to a 2015 Consumer Reports survey, half of consumers believe the “natural” designation means animals were raised outdoors. Hormel’s Natural Choice® products, in contrast, are not from more humane or more natural farms, but come from the same industrialized factory farms as any of Hormel’s other products.
“Meat companies like Hormel have been quick to pounce on misconceptions about what ‘natural’ means,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “As an organization dedicated to transparency in animal agriculture and truth in meat advertising, the Animal Legal Defense Fund is standing up to vindicate the rights of deceived consumers and to prevent Hormel from wrongfully gaining an advantage over more humane farms.”
Some of Hormel’s standard factory farming practices were recently revealed in shocking new undercover footage from one of Hormel’s largest suppliers. The undercover investigation was carried out by the Animal Legal Defense Fund.
“Hormel’s ‘natural’ meats come from the same pigs and the same giant, factory slaughterhouses that are used for the company’s canned Spam® products,” said Leah Nicholls, Staff Attorney at Public Justice. “The so-called ‘Natural Choice®’ products are not ‘natural’ by any definition a mom or dad would expect or rely on when deciding what to feed their family. Hormel also treats these products with ‘acid starter culture’ in order to produce artificial preservatives Hormel is misleading consumers and misrepresenting how its meats are produced in a brazen attempt to sell products at premium prices that boost the company’s bottom line.”
The Richman Law Group has filed numerous cases against food companies falsely using the word “natural” to describe their products that are anything but. “This case represents a new line of attack on meat companies taking advantage of consumers seeking out natural foods,” said Kim Richman of the Richman Law Group.
Today’s suit was filed on behalf of D.C.-area consumers, and alleges Hormel is violating the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act.
A dangerous bill, SB 1884, aimed at stopping whistleblowers from exposing animal cruelty is moving quickly through the Texas legislature. This bill has already passed the Texas Senate – your voice is urgently needed to prevent it from becoming law.
Please call (preferred) or email your representative and ask them to oppose SB 1884 – a dangerous bill aimed at stopping whistleblowers from exposing animal cruelty. This bill has already passed the Texas Senate – your voice is urgently needed!
Today, a coalition of public interest groups, led by the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Iowa’s new Ag-Gag law — a law that is substantively similar to an Iowa law struck down by the same federal court.April 22, 2019 Press Release