Holding Slaughterhouses Accountable for Water Pollution
Cape Fear River Watch v. Environmental Protection Agency
The Animal Legal Defense Fund joined a coalition of conservation and community groups in filing a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency for failing to update national standards restricting water pollution from slaughterhouses.
In Spring 2020, the court ruled the lawsuit can move forward.
Opening brief due in July 2020
Thousands of slaughterhouses across the country rely on outdated pollution-control technology, resulting in contamination of our waterways. After the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refused to update national standards regulating pollution from slaughterhouses, a coalition of conservation and community groups sued.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? The coalition filed the lawsuit under the Clean Water Act against the EPA after the agency failed to revise federal water pollution standards for slaughterhouses that discharge processed wastewater into waterways or facilities that send wastewater to sewage plants before discharging into rivers and streams. These standards were last updated 15 years ago, and more than a third of slaughterhouses operate under guidelines from the 1970s. The Clean Water Act mandates that the EPA set such standards and review them annually to determine whether they comply with the latest in pollution-control technology.
What court is the lawsuit filed in? The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Why this case is important: Technology that can reduce pollution exists, and the EPA has recognized slaughterhouses are one of the largest industrial sources of nitrogen water pollution without updated standards.
But instead of protecting the environment and public health, the federal government is giving slaughterhouses, which kill more than 8 billion chickens, 100 million pigs, and 30 million cows annually, a free pass by allowing them to operate under ineffective and outdated water pollution standards. These plants discharge contaminants such as blood, oil, grease, and fats, as well as nitrogen and phosphorous pollution. The costs of their pollution are borne largely by communities with lower incomes whose drinking water is jeopardized, as well as neighboring wild animals who depend on clean water to survive.
HF 775 is aimed at criminalizing whistleblowing and undercover investigations in agricultural facilities, thus “gagging” activists and others who expose animal abuse in factory farms and slaughterhouses.April 12, 2021 Action Alert
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in favor of the Animal Legal Defense Fund and its co-plaintiffs, denying an attempt by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to dismiss a lawsuit against the agency.February 23, 2021 Press Release
New White Paper Offers Policy Recommendations to Combat Zoonotic Diseases and Pandemic Risk from Factory FarmingThe Animal Legal Defense Fund released the second in a series of white papers — COVID-19 and Factory Farming —providing policy recommendations to address industrial animal agriculture’s role in our heightened risk for zoonotic diseases outbreaks, like COVID-19, and its potential to be the source of the next global pandemic.November 19, 2020 Press Release
Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help v United States Environmental Protection Agency
Farm Sanctuary v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Petition to the USDA submitted in June 2020