Challenging Arkansas’ Meat Labeling Law
Turtle Island Foods v. Soman
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a federal lawsuit challenging an Arkansas law that prohibits plant- and cell-based meat producers from, among other things, using “meat” terminology because their products do not come from a slaughtered animal.
Preliminary injunction granted
The Animal Legal Defense Fund is part of a coalition that filed a lawsuit in Arkansas challenging the constitutionality of a state law that prevents plant- and cell-based meat producers from, among other things, using “meat” terminology because their products do not come from a slaughtered animal.
Enacted in 2019, Arkansas’ law is a brazen attempt to stifle the growing demand for plant-based protein products as well as the coming availability of cell-based meat — meat made directly from animal cells without the need for raising and slaughtering animals. Producers who sell products like “veggie sausage” or “turkey-style deli slices” would be penalized $1,000 for each product they’ve sold in the state.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed this lawsuit in coalition with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of Arkansas, The Good Food Institute, and plant-based meat producer Tofurky because the law violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the Dormant Commerce Clause, the Supremacy Clause, and the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? The state of Arkansas under the U.S. Constitution. Our lawsuit argues that the law violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
What court is the lawsuit filed in? U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Why this case is important: More and more consumers are rejecting animal products — which rely on intense animal cruelty — in favor of plant-based alternatives. These plant-based products, along with future cell-based products, present a growing threat to the market share of conventional meat products from slaughtered animals. But instead of responding to the demand for sustainably-produced products, the meat industry is attempting to use state legislatures to criminalize truthful speech under the guise of protecting consumers from “confusion.” However, no evidence supports the claim that consumers are or would otherwise be confused by plant- or cell-based meat products. The true aim of Arkansas’ law is to protect the animal agriculture industry by putting in place unconstitutional barriers that impede innovation by plant- and cell-based producers.
Court Rules Louisiana Label Censorship Law Unconstitutional After First Amendment Challenge from Tofurky
Court Rules Louisiana Label Censorship Law Unconstitutional After First Amendment Challenge from TofurkyMeat and dairy alternatives can use common naming conventions in the state without fear of prosecutionMarch 29, 2022 Press Release
Tofurky and Plant Based Foods Association Team Up to Challenge Unconstitutional Oklahoma Censorship Label LawLawsuit asserts the law creates a patchwork of standards that threaten to preclude nationwide sales for plant-based meat producersNovember 10, 2021 Press Release
Animal Legal Defense Fund Urges FDA for Clear Regulatory Guidance on Labeling of Cell-Cultured Fish and Shellfish ProductsThis week the Animal Legal Defense Fund submitted comments to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advocating for accurate, consistent, and flexible labeling of cell-cultured fish and shellfish products — meat or flesh grown from the cells of fresh or saltwater finfish, crustaceans, and other forms of aquatic animal life.March 11, 2021 Press Release
Turtle Island Foods v Richardson
Tofurky v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry
Barnes v. Tillamook