USDA Must Defend Reissuance of License to Law-Violating Roadside Zoo, Court Says
Animal Legal Defense Fund scores significant victory against USDA rubberstamp license renewal
Des Moines, Iowa – In a victory for animal protection oversight, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) cannot “arbitrarily and capriciously” renew an exhibitor license to a roadside zoo it knows is in violation of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). The Animal Legal Defense Fund’s lawsuit against the USDA is being sent back to U.S. District Court, overturning an earlier dismissal of the lawsuit.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund sued the USDA in 2014 for its renewal of an animal exhibitor license to Cricket Hollow Animal Park (formerly known as Cricket Hollow Zoo), a roadside zoo in Iowa. The zoo was issued 11 violations by the agency the day its license was renewed.
In 2015, USDA reissued the license again, despite the fact that according to the USDA’s own inspection reports, it had cited the facility for over 100 violations in the prior five years. Citations included inadequate staffing, unsanitary facilities, and poor veterinary care.
“It is obvious that licensees cannot be trusted to police themselves, and it is the responsibility of the USDA to ensure compliance with the AWA,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund executive director Stephen Wells. “To receive an exhibitor’s license, a facility must demonstrate it complies with the AWA—and the USDA cannot disregard compliance problems that it knows exist.”
The case will now proceed back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The Animal Legal Defense Fund looks forward to demonstrating that given the “smoking gun” of an obvious history of violations and noncompliance with the AWA by Cricket Hollow Animal Park, the USDA’s renewal of its exhibitor license was in fact arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
The USDA is currently taking comments to reconsider its rubberstamping license renewal policy. The Animal Legal Defense Fund will be submitting comments, due October 23, 2017.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund previously won two lawsuits against Cricket Hollow Animal Park, in 2015 under the Endangered Species Act—removing four tigers and three lemurs from the zoo, and again in 2016, which lead to the removal of two endangered African lions.
Lawsuit Filed Against USDA For Lack of Transparency into Inspection Process of Primate Research FacilitiesToday, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and Rise for Animals filed a lawsuit against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for the agency’s failure to respond to a request for public records related to the inconsistent inspection process of nonhuman primate research facilities.October 16, 2020 Press Release
The Animal Legal Defense Fund Applauds Long Overdue Closure of ‘Tiger King’ Zoo, Urges Animals Be Transferred to SanctuaryThe Animal Legal Defense Fund applauds the closure of the Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park, the zoo depicted in the Netflix documentary, “Tiger King,” following the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) suspension of its owner’s exhibitor license.August 20, 2020 News
After multiple lawsuits filed and fought by the Animal Legal Defense Fund, the Tiger Truck Stop has finally stopped exhibiting animals and tore down its cages. The Tiger Truck Stop, the infamous gas station in Gross Tete, Louisiana, held Tony — an endangered Siberian-Bengal tiger — from the age of 6-months until his death at the age of 17 in 2017.July 14, 2020 Press Release