USDA Must Defend Reissuance of License to Law-Violating Roadside Zoo, Court Says
Animal Legal Defense Fund scores significant victory against USDA rubberstamp license renewal
Des Moines, Iowa – In a victory for animal protection oversight, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) cannot “arbitrarily and capriciously” renew an exhibitor license to a roadside zoo it knows is in violation of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). The Animal Legal Defense Fund’s lawsuit against the USDA is being sent back to U.S. District Court, overturning an earlier dismissal of the lawsuit.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund sued the USDA in 2014 for its renewal of an animal exhibitor license to Cricket Hollow Animal Park (formerly known as Cricket Hollow Zoo), a roadside zoo in Iowa. The zoo was issued 11 violations by the agency the day its license was renewed. In 2015, USDA reissued the license again, despite the fact that according to the USDA’s own inspection reports, it had cited the facility for over 100 violations in the prior five years. Citations included inadequate staffing, unsanitary facilities, and poor veterinary care.
“It is obvious that licensees cannot be trusted to police themselves, and it is the responsibility of the USDA to ensure compliance with the Animal Welfare Act,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “To receive an exhibitor’s license, a facility must demonstrate it complies with the Animal Welfare Act—and the USDA cannot disregard compliance problems that it knows exist.”
The case will now proceed back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The Animal Legal Defense Fund looks forward to demonstrating that given the “smoking gun” of an obvious history of violations and noncompliance with the AWA by Cricket Hollow Animal Park, the USDA’s renewal of its exhibitor license was in fact arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
The USDA is currently taking comments to reconsider its rubberstamping license renewal policy. The Animal Legal Defense Fund will be submitting comments, due October 23, 2017.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund previously won two lawsuits against Cricket Hollow Animal Park, in 2015 under the Endangered Species Act—removing four tigers and three lemurs from the zoo, and again in 2016, which lead to the removal of two endangered African lions.
For more information, visit aldf.org.
This week, a coalition of organizations, led by the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging a 2016 decision by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) to exempt some factory farms from critical environmental laws.December 13, 2018 News
Federal Appeals Court to Hear Arguments in Lawsuit Concerning USDA’s Secrecy on Animal Welfare RecordsOn Monday, Dec. 17, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco will hear oral arguments from the Animal Legal Defense Fund in the lawsuit against the USDA for removing tens of thousands of animal welfare records from the agency’s website.December 13, 2018 Press Release