Sentience — being a living, feeling creature — forms the very core of what it means to be an animal. Indeed, the ability to feel is what distinguishes animals from objects — it makes animals ‘whos’, not ‘whats.’ While the legal system has grappled with this truism from its inception, only recently have courts begun building an internally coherent approach to ensuring that the law treats animals as feeling creatures who deserve justice.
Join Animal Legal Defense Fund Senior Staff Attorneys Jamie Contreras and David B. Rosengard as they discuss how the legal system treats animal sentience and how a trilogy of Oregon cases recognizing animal sentience points towards a new framework for animals within the law.
This webinar was prerecorded. Watch it now!
Resources
- Animals’ Legal Status
- Two Great Legal Victories for Animals in Oregon
- Update: Each Animal Counts!
- Advocating for Justice in Oregon: Neglected Horse Sues Former Owner
- How Animals Differ from Other Types of “Property” Under the Law
- Dogs Are Not Mere Property, Rules Oregon Supreme Court
- Critical Caselaw: Judicial Recognition of Animal Sentience – PPT Presentation (PDF)
- State v. Fessenden Court of Appeals (PDF)
- State v. Fessenden Supreme Court (PDF)
- State v. Newcomb Supreme Court (PDF)
- State v. Nix Supreme Court 2014 (PDF)
- State v. Nix Supreme Court (PDF)
- Judicial Recognition of Animal Sentience discussion guide (PDF)
-
David B. Rosengard
Managing Attorney
Focus Area
How We Work
Issues
Related
-
CA Regulators Poised to Approve Most Egregious Biogas Scheme Yet
California Air Resource Board poised to allow massive incentives for mega-dairy and hydrogen facility in San Joaquin Valley, threatening local air qualityJune 4, 2026 Press Release -
How to Keep Dogs Safe This Summer
Hot Weather Tips from the Animal Legal Defense FundMay 26, 2026 News -
Animal Groups Refile Complaint Over Alleged Texas Slaughterhouse Cruelty
Animal law groups request accountability after a bull was shot four times with a rifleMay 11, 2026 News
