California Unconstitutionally Restricts the Marketing of Plant-Based Dairy Products
Animal Legal Defense Fund files lawsuit as state targets plant-based food producer Miyoko's for using 'dairy' terminology.
SAN FRANCISCO – The Animal Legal Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit against the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) on behalf of plant-based food producer Miyoko’s Creamery (Miyoko’s), after the agency sent an enforcement letter instructing the company to stop using terms like “dairy” and “butter” on its products — even with qualifiers like “vegan” and “made with plants.”
The agency also instructed Miyoko’s not to represent its vegan butter products as “cruelty-free,” despite plant-based products avoiding the cruelty associated with animal agriculture. The agency told Miyoko’s to remove a photograph from its website of a woman hugging a cow, as well.
The lawsuit, filed today, argues that the CDFA’s misapplication of federal regulations is an unconstitutional violation of Miyoko’s right to free speech. The agency’s action is an attempt to censor speech, violating the First Amendment by unconstitutionally restricting truthful commercial speech.
“The government has no business censoring humane companies from accurately describing their animal-friendly products,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “The California Department of Food and Agriculture should be at the forefront of efforts to shift away from destructive factory farming, not acting to stifle its competitors.”
The dairy industry claims that terms like “butter” and “cheese” on plant-based products confuses consumers, yet there is no evidence to support these claims. Moreover, animal agriculture causes immense animal suffering, pollutes the environment, and threatens human health and welfare.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund has been at the forefront of demanding fair oversight of plant-based foods, in the face of aggressive lobbying by animal agribusiness — which has attempted to strongarm state and federal lawmakers and regulatory agencies into prohibiting plant-based products from using commonly understood terms in their marketing and packaging.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund is working to ensure these unconstitutional laws are struck down and that plant-based and dairy products, along with cultivated meat products — meat produced from animals’ cells, without having to raise and slaughter animals — have equal footing in the marketplace. The organization currently represents the interests of both plant-based and cultivated meat producers in lawsuits in Missouri and Arkansas that challenge unconstitutional product labeling restrictions.
Deepak Gupta from the firm Gupta Wessler is co-counsel in this lawsuit.
Miyoko’s Preliminary Injunction Granted to Retain Labels without Threat of Enforcement as Case ContinuesThe Animal Legal Defense Fund announced that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has granted a preliminary injunction that allows Miyoko’s Creamery (Miyoko’s) to maintain its labeling as-is while the case proceeds without fear of enforcement by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA).August 24, 2020 Press Release
A series of billboards, in English and Spanish, are launching near slaughterhouses across the country — offering an online tip portal where industrial animal agriculture workers can report any concerns. Joaquin Phoenix partnered with the Animal Legal Defense Fund in offering and promoting ReportAnimalAg.com to allow individuals to remain anonymous.July 6, 2020 Press Release
The Animal Legal Defense Fund announced that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has denied the California Department of Food and Agriculture’s (CDFA) motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed on behalf of Miyoko’s Creamery (Miyoko’s).June 26, 2020 Press Release