Ending Research on Captive Chimpanzees
Filed Comments in Opposition to Captive Chimpanzee testing
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed comments to the National Institutes of Health urging the agency to adopt a proposal to severely restrict research on captive chimpanzees.
After decades of scrutiny and pressure from animal rights groups, the general public and, increasingly, the international community, in 2010 the National Institute of Health (NIH) requisitioned a study from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to examine the use of chimpanzees in NIH-funded behavioral and biomedical research.
That report, issued one year later in December 2011, concluded that “most current biomedical use of chimpanzees is unnecessary” and suggested that future research on chimpanzees be limited. Following this IOM study, a working group was tasked with reviewing the proposals and advising on their implementation.
Another report was then published in January 2013. The NIH published this report as part of a “Request for Information” through which it sought public comment on the recommendations.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund, together with pro bono legal counsel from the law firm of Proskauer Rose, filed comments to NIH urging the agency to adopt a proposal to severely restrict research on captive chimpanzees by defunding chimpanzee research and retiring chimpanzees to the federal sanctuary system — and to go even further by banning all federal support for chimpanzee research on the grounds that it is both ineffective and unethical.
In November 2015, the NIH announced that “we’ve reached a tipping point” in terms of public attitude and demand from researchers, and that the agency would no longer support the use of chimpanzees in biomedical research.
Animal Advocacy Group Calls on Puerto Rican Officials to Protect Animals Languishing at Troubled State Zoo
Animal Advocacy Group Calls on Puerto Rican Officials to Protect Animals Languishing at Troubled State ZooComplaint urges the Puerto Rican government to investigate and revoke any permits granted to the Dr. Juan A. Rivero National Zoological Park and immediately send the animals there to sanctuaries, due to the Endangered Species Act and cruelty violations.October 24, 2018 Press Release
On May 8, 2018, the New York Court of Appeals denied the Nonhuman Rights Project’s (NhRP) motion to review a lower court’s ruling that two caged chimpanzees were not subject to the law of habeas corpus.September 7, 2018 Animal Law Update
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling that Naruto lacked statutory standing to sue under the federal Copyright Act.August 7, 2018 Animal Law Update
Public Comments Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Submitted Comments to APHIS
Request for Permit Revocation and Relocation of Animals at Dr. Juan A. Rivero National Zoological Park Under Puerto Rico’s Exotic Animals Laws