Ending Research on Captive Chimpanzees
Filed Comments in Opposition to Captive Chimpanzee testing
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed comments to the National Institutes of Health urging the agency to adopt a proposal to severely restrict research on captive chimpanzees.
December 18, 2018
After decades of scrutiny and pressure from animal rights groups, the general public and, increasingly, the international community, in 2010 the National Institute of Health (NIH) requisitioned a study from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to examine the use of chimpanzees in NIH-funded behavioral and biomedical research.
That report, issued one year later in December 2011, concluded that “most current biomedical use of chimpanzees is unnecessary” and suggested that future research on chimpanzees be limited. Following this IOM study, a working group was tasked with reviewing the proposals and advising on their implementation.
Another report was then published in January 2013. The NIH published this report as part of a “Request for Information” through which it sought public comment on the recommendations.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund, together with pro bono legal counsel from the law firm of Proskauer Rose, filed comments to NIH urging the agency to adopt a proposal to severely restrict research on captive chimpanzees by defunding chimpanzee research and retiring chimpanzees to the federal sanctuary system — and to go even further by banning all federal support for chimpanzee research on the grounds that it is both ineffective and unethical.
In November 2015, the NIH announced that “we’ve reached a tipping point” in terms of public attitude and demand from researchers, and that the agency would no longer support the use of chimpanzees in biomedical research.
Donate to Protect Animals
Help animals win the legal protections they so desperately need and deserve, and ensure they have an advocate in courtrooms and legislatures across the country.
Federal Judge Rules USDA Acted Unlawfully in Denying Petition to Improve the Psychological Well-Being of Primates Used in Research
Federal Judge Rules USDA Acted Unlawfully in Denying Petition to Improve the Psychological Well-Being of Primates Used in ResearchOn March 23, 2023, Judge Julie Rubin of the federal district court in Maryland issued a decision, ruling that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) acted unlawfully by denying a petition for rulemaking to improve the standard for the psychological well-being of primates in researchMarch 23, 2023 News
Ecuador’s Constitutional Court Rules Wild Animals Are Subjects of Legal Rights Under the Rights of NatureIn January 2022, the Constitutional Court of Ecuador issued a landmark ruling that individual wild animals are subjects of legal rights under Ecuador’s “rights of nature” constitutional provision. The case involved a woolly monkey who was taken from the wild as a baby and kept unlawfully in a private home for 18 years.January 4, 2023 Animal Law Update
Evidence Shows University of Wisconsin-Madison Illegally Censors Critics of Animal TestingAnimal Legal Defense Fund files motion for summary judgement with damning evidence against the universityMay 19, 2022 Press Release
Urging the Extension of Endangered Status to Captive Chimpanzees
Public Comments Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Urging Stronger Protections for Animals Used in Research
Submitted Comments to APHIS
Looking for case and legal resources? View ResourcesSee More
You Can Protect Animals
Since 1979, the Animal Legal Defense Fund has led the charge to win animals the legal protection they so desperately need—and deserve. Your generous gift will assure that we can continue to take on cases that advance the interests of animals.