
Ending Killing Contests in Massachusetts
Regulation enacted on December 18, 2019
In 2019, Massachusetts adopted regulations banning killing contests for certain animals, including coyotes, foxes, and bobcats.
Next Step
Case Closed
Killing contests are a bloodsport — they make a “game” of inflicting suffering and death on wild animals. Contestants typically compete for cash or prizes for killing the largest, smallest, or greatest number of animals.
These contests are unethical and out of step with most Americans’ values. They are also ecologically destructive and ineffective — no scientific evidence demonstrates these contests reduce the population of targeted species. Instead, they may actually increase populations and lead to increased conflicts. Nonlethal, preventive methods are the best way to reduce conflicts with wildlife.
In December 2019, the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife (MassWildlife) and the Fisheries and Wildlife Board adopted regulations banning killing contests for numerous furbearing animals: coyotes, bobcats, red foxes, gray foxes, weasels, mink, skunks, river otters, muskrats, beavers, fishers, raccoons, and opossum.
Massachusetts joins Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Vermont in limiting or prohibiting killing contests. Vermont and New Mexico outlawed coyote-killing contests in 2018 and 2019, respectively. California and Arizona’s laws are broader — California banned killing contests for furbearing and nongame mammals, and Arizona banned contests for furbearing animals.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund played an active role in this victory for Massachusetts wildlife, educating and rallying residents, as well as testifying at public hearings and submitting comments along with a coalition of national and state animal protection organizations in support of the proposed regulations. In addition to encouraging states to enact laws prohibiting these senseless events, the Animal Legal Defense Fund also challenges killing contests through litigation and has successfully challenged coyote-killing contests in Oregon and Kansas.
Sign Up!
Join the Animal Legal Defense Fund's email list to stay up to date on lawsuits, legislation, and regulations affecting animals.
Recent News
-
Court Upholds Constitutionality of San Francisco Fur Ban
International Fur Trade Federation’s amended complaints dismissed in decisive victory for animalsMarch 31, 2021 Press Release -
Bill Banning Private Possession of Big Cats Reintroduced in House of Representatives
Representatives Mike Quigley (D-IL) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) reintroduced the Big Cat Public Safety Act in the U.S. House of Representatives. The House of Representatives voted 272 to 114 to pass the same bill in December.January 11, 2021 Press Release -
Animal Exploiter: Robert Sawmiller
For years, captive wild animals have suffered in the care of traveling zoo operator Robert Sawmiller. On December 9, 2020 two wolves and a Labrador named Fancy were rescued and transported to sanctuary through legal action brought by the Animal Legal Defense Fund.
Related Cases
-
Ending Killing Contests in Colorado
Regulation enacted on April 30, 2020
-
Challenging Wildlife Services for Violating NEPA
Center for Biological Diversity v. USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services
-
Urging Humboldt County, CA to Terminate Contract with Wildlife-Killing Federal Agency
Letter sent on April 30, 2019
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See More