Demanding Public Records Relating to Invasive Cat Experiments
CAARE v. SUNY
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit to compel the disclosure of public records regarding invasive experiments on cats and kittens conducted by the State University of New York College of Optometry.
Next Step
Settlement reached November 21, 2019
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit to compel the disclosure of public records regarding invasive experiments on cats and kittens conducted by the State University of New York College of Optometry (SUNY). The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Research & Experimentation (CAARE), is in response to SUNY’s refusal to release the records after receiving a request under the New York Freedom of Information Law.
Since 2002, SUNY has experimented on the brains of cats using taxpayer dollars. The stated purpose of the experiments, which began at Rockefeller University in 1985, is to understand the part of the feline brain controlling vision. However, after three decades of invasive and painful experiments on cats, the research has not produced any useful information applicable to human vision disorders.
Under New York’s Freedom of Information Law — a state law similar to the federal Freedom of Information Act, which favors government transparency — the public has a legal right to know about the experiments being performed, and the SUNY College of Optometry should and must release the records.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? The State University of New York College of Optometry for violating the New York Freedom of Information Law
What court is the lawsuit filed in? New York State Supreme Court (the lowest New York state court)
Why this case is important: The SUNY College of Optometry has refused to release the public records regarding its cat experiments, claiming that releasing the information to an animal protection organization such as CAARE would endanger the safety of researchers and that the research qualifies as a trade secret. But the school’s efforts to keep the public in the dark violates the New York Freedom of Information Law. Under this law, the public has a legal right to know about the taxpayer-funded experiments being performed on cats and kittens.
Recent News
-
Highest Court in Ohio Rules that All Dogs and Cats Deserve to be Protected from Cruelty
In overturning the lower court, Ohio Supreme Court confirms ALDF’s amicus position that the state’s animal cruelty statute protects a community kitten who was subject to abuse.October 30, 2024 News -
Nearly 70 Percent of Veterinary Professionals Oppose Cat Declawing as States Seek to Ban the Procedure
New poll underscores the surge of support from the veterinary community to ban the cruel practice.June 24, 2024 Press Release -
Nearly 70 Percent of Veterinary Professionals Oppose Cat Declawing as Rhode Island Seeks to Ban the Procedure
New poll underscores the surge of support from the veterinary community to ban the cruel practice.June 12, 2024 Press Release
Related Cases
-
Challenging the USDA’s Secret Policy on Laboratory Inspections
Rise for Animals v. USDA
-
Challenging a Florida Kitten Breeder’s Cruelty and Fraud
Rozetti v. Adorable Stars
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See MoreTake a Stand Against Animal Testing
Did you know an estimated 100 million animals are used in testing and research in the United States every year? Take a stand against animal testing by signing our cruelty-free pledge today.