Compelling the USDA to Protect Primates Used in Research
New England Anti-Vivisection Society v. Goldentyer
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit against the USDA for failure to protect the psychological well-being of primates used in biomedical research.
Awaiting the USDA to File an Answer or Motion to Dismiss
In July 2020, the Animal Legal Defense Fund, New England Anti-Vivisection Society, and the International Primate Protection League filed a lawsuit against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for failure to protect primates used in biomedical research. The coalition is represented by Harvard Law School’s Animal Law and Policy Clinic.
The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, follows the USDA’s rejection of a 2014 petition by the animal protection groups asking the USDA to promulgate specific standards for the psychological well-being of all non-human primates similar to those adopted a year earlier in 2013 by its sister agency, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), for chimpanzees used in federally funded research. The Animal Welfare Act was amended in 1985 to require the USDA to promulgate standards that promote “the psychological well-being” of primates.
Current regulations were last updated in 1991, when much less was known about the psychological needs of primates. These regulations defer to research facilities to develop their own enrichment plans, and have been criticized by the USDA’s own inspectors as vague and unenforceable. The regulations fall far short of what the NIH concluded was necessary to protect the psychological well-being of chimpanzees.
The lawsuit seeks to protect the tens of thousands of other primates—macaques, marmosets, and baboons—used in research in this country.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? Sonny Perdue, the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Elizabeth Goldentyer, the Acting Deputy Administrator for Animal Care at The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), are being sued under the Administrative Procedure Act for rejecting the 2014 petition calling on the USDA to promulgate better standards for the psychological well-being of non-human primates.
Why this case is important: Nonhuman primates, such as apes and monkeys, are highly intelligent animals with complex psychological and physical needs. But current regulations do not impose specific standards for a physical environment that is adequate to ensure the psychological well-being of nonhuman primates used in research. As one participant at an NIH-sponsored Symposium on Animal Welfare and Scientific Research lamented, “[i]f you show a picture of a primate cage from 40 years ago and a primate cage now, it’s basically the same: it’s all metal with a perch added.”
The requested regulations are necessary to provide all nonhuman primates used in research the environmental enrichment they need — and to establish clear, specific standards that can be uniformly implemented and enforced by the USDA across research institutions as required by the AWA.
Court Holds Cricket Hollow Zoo Owners in Contempt for Removing Animals Designated for Rescue in Violation of Court Order
Court Holds Cricket Hollow Zoo Owners in Contempt for Removing Animals Designated for Rescue in Violation of Court OrderToday the Delaware County district court granted a motion for contempt filed by the Animal Legal Defense Fund against Cricket Hollow Zoo and its owners, Pamela and Thomas Sellner, seeking the whereabouts of more than 100 animals who “disappeared” prior to a court-ordered rescue.October 5, 2021 Press Release
The Iowa Court of Appeals ruled in favor of plaintiffs represented by the Animal Legal Defense Fund in a lawsuit against Cricket Hollow Zoo for violating state animal cruelty laws following an appeal of the court’s 2019 decision.August 5, 2021 Press Release
In a letter to the USDA, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and others explain the zoo has repeatedly violated standards of the Animal Welfare ActJune 2, 2021 Press Release
Krasno v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin
Challenging the USDA for Public Records of Inspection Process at Nonhuman Primates Research Facilities
Animal Legal Defense Fund and Rise for Animals v. United States Department of Agriculture