Compelling the FDA To Produce Factory Egg Farm Inspection Reports
Animal Legal Defense Fund v U.S. Food and Drug Administration
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a federal lawsuit to compel the FDA to produce inspection reports of factory egg farms without censoring important information about the hen population and living conditions.
Status
Next Step
In 2012, the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit asking a federal court to compel the Food and Drug Administration to produce Establishment Inspection Reports of several factory egg farms in Texas without censoring important information about the hen population and living conditions.
We’d previously requested these documents in 2011 in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. But when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the Animal Legal Defense Fund the inspection reports, it censored critical information about the hen population and living conditions. This information is necessary to understand the welfare of the animals as well as the risk of disease outbreaks that affect public health and safety.
In 2013, the Northern District of California ruled that the FDA must provide the number of birds per cage but could withhold the rest of the contested information. The Animal Legal Defense Fund appealed that ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals where we argued we were entitled to a trial to resolve the factual disputes in the case.
The Ninth Circuit ultimately heard the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s appeal en banc, and set groundbreaking precedent by providing less deference to district courts that resolve factual disputes in FOIA cases on summary judgment without a trial.
Applying that new standard, the Ninth Circuit ordered that the case be sent back to the district court for a trial. That trial occurred in April 2018.
On January 23, 2019 the district court ordered the FDA to disclose the total number of hen houses, the total number of floors per hen house, the total number of cage rows per hen house, and the total number of cage tiers per hen house for the factory farms at issue – nearly all of the challenged information the FDA withheld. Several months later, the FDA filed an appeal. Due to a new Supreme Court ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated this judgment and remanded the case to the District Court in 2020.
You Can Protect Animals
Since 1979, the Animal Legal Defense Fund has led the charge to win animals the legal protection they so desperately need—and deserve. Your generous gift will assure that we can continue to take on cases that advance the interests of animals.
Recent News
-
Lawsuit Filed Demanding FDA Respond to Petitions Seeking to Ban Ractopamine
FDA’s approval for ractopamine relied primarily on safety studies conducted by the drugmaker.March 26, 2024 Press Release -
Fourth Circuit Enjoins North Carolina Ag-Gag Law
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit handed an important win to plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging North Carolina’s Ag-Gag law, ruling that undercover investigations and whistleblowing are considered newsgathering activities protected by the First Amendment.February 23, 2023 Press Release -
Court Strikes Down Second Iowa Ag-Gag Law
Public interest coalition celebrates another win against unconstitutional statute barring undercover investigations at factory farmsMarch 15, 2022 Press Release
Related Cases
-
Urging California Air Resources Board to Regulate Factory Farm Emissions
Petition for Rulemaking
-
Challenging FDA’s Unreasonable Delay in Responding to Petition to Limit Use or Withdraw Approval of Ractopamine
Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al. v. FDA, et al.
-
Challenging the USDA’s Secret Policy on Laboratory Inspections
Rise for Animals v. USDA
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See MoreYou Can Protect Animals
Since 1979, the Animal Legal Defense Fund has led the charge to win animals the legal protection they so desperately need—and deserve. Your generous gift will assure that we can continue to take on cases that advance the interests of animals.