Challenging FSA’s Medium-sized CAFO Exemptions
Dakota Rural Action v. United States Department of Agriculture
A coalition of organizations, including the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized CAFOs from environmental review under NEPA.
Status
Next Step
On December 5, 2018, a coalition of organizations, including the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The lawsuit argues that this exemption violates two federal laws — NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? The lawsuit was brought against the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency. In the lawsuit, we argue that a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized CAFOs from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) violates two federal laws: NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act.
What court is the lawsuit filed in? U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Why this case is important: CAFOs generate massive amounts of waste, contaminating air, drinking water, and surface waters, impacting the health of both people and animals. Due to the threats these facilities pose to the environment and public health, NEPA requires federal agencies like the Farm Service Agency to conduct environmental reviews before granting loans for CAFOs.
Removing an entire class of CAFOs from NEPA’s purview greatly undercuts the law’s ability to protect our environment. Moreover, doing so violates federal law.
Recent News
-
U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of California’s Landmark Proposition 12 Animal Cruelty Law
The Animal Legal Defense Fund helps protect the strongest farmed animal protection law in the countryJuly 2, 2025 News -
Petition Urges FDA to Reconsider Decision Not to Ban Controversial Drug Ractopamine
Common livestock feed additive poses risks to human healthApril 29, 2025 Press Release -
Settlement Reached in California Water Use Lawsuit against Foster Poultry Farms
Foster Poultry Farms agrees to improve water conservation and animal welfare at its Livingston, California poultry-processing plantApril 21, 2025 Press Release
Related Cases
-
Urging USDA to Revoke AWA Exhibitor License from Jason Clay (2024)
Complaint to USDA submitted on February 27, 2024
-
Lawsuit to Force USDA to Recognize Its Authority to Take Possession of Animals Upon License Revocation
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. USDA
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See More