Challenging FSA’s Medium-sized CAFO Exemptions
Dakota Rural Action v. United States Department of Agriculture
A coalition of organizations, including the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized CAFOs from environmental review under NEPA.
Next Step
Awaiting court order
Response due October 31, 2019
On December 5, 2018, a coalition of organizations, including the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The lawsuit argues that this exemption violates two federal laws — NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? The lawsuit was brought against the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency. In the lawsuit, we argue that a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized CAFOs from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) violates two federal laws: NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act.
What court is the lawsuit filed in? U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Why this case is important: CAFOs generate massive amounts of waste, contaminating air, drinking water, and surface waters, impacting the health of both people and animals. Due to the threats these facilities pose to the environment and public health, NEPA requires federal agencies like the Farm Service Agency to conduct environmental reviews before granting loans for CAFOs.
Removing an entire class of CAFOs from NEPA’s purview greatly undercuts the law’s ability to protect our environment. Moreover, doing so violates federal law.
Recent News
-
Exposing Animal Abusers: Update on the Animal Welfare Blackout
In early 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) purged tens of thousands of important documents related to animal welfare from the agency’s website. The purged inspection reports documented violations of the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA).September 18, 2019 News -
Federal Rule Allowing Cruel High-Speed Pig Slaughter Violates Federal Law
The USDA violated federal law in finalizing this rule, acting contrary to the mountain of evidence before it demonstrating the rule’s dangers, and flouting humane slaughter and meat inspection laws.September 17, 2019 News -
Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Lawsuit Challenging USDA Secrecy on Animal Welfare Act Records
Animal protection coalition wins important victory in fight to restore animal welfare databasesAugust 29, 2019 Press Release
Related Cases
-
Challenging Fairlife’s Deceptive Marketing Practices
Alain Michael v. Fairlife LLC
-
Challenging Federal Government’s Waiver of Environmental Laws to Build Border Wall
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Kirstjen M. Nielsen
-
Urging Humboldt County, CA to Terminate Contract with Wildlife-Killing Federal Agency
Letter sent on April 30, 2019
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See More