Challenging FSA’s Medium-sized CAFO Exemptions
Dakota Rural Action v. United States Department of Agriculture
A coalition of organizations, including the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized CAFOs from environmental review under NEPA.
Next Step
Awaiting court order
Response due October 31, 2019
On December 5, 2018, a coalition of organizations, including the Animal Legal Defense Fund, filed a lawsuit challenging a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The lawsuit argues that this exemption violates two federal laws — NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Who is being sued, why, and under what law? The lawsuit was brought against the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency. In the lawsuit, we argue that a 2016 regulation issued by the Farm Service Agency that exempts medium-sized CAFOs from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) violates two federal laws: NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act.
What court is the lawsuit filed in? U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Why this case is important: CAFOs generate massive amounts of waste, contaminating air, drinking water, and surface waters, impacting the health of both people and animals. Due to the threats these facilities pose to the environment and public health, NEPA requires federal agencies like the Farm Service Agency to conduct environmental reviews before granting loans for CAFOs.
Removing an entire class of CAFOs from NEPA’s purview greatly undercuts the law’s ability to protect our environment. Moreover, doing so violates federal law.
Recent News
-
Lawsuit Filed Against USDA For Lack of Transparency into Inspection Process of Primate Research Facilities
Today, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and Rise for Animals filed a lawsuit against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for the agency’s failure to respond to a request for public records related to the inconsistent inspection process of nonhuman primate research facilities.October 16, 2020 Press Release -
Appeal Challenges Arkansas’ Unconstitutional ‘Ag-Gag’ Law
Advocates continue to fight law that penalizes whistleblowing on factory farms, other businesses in violation of the First AmendmentMarch 12, 2020 Press Release -
Court Rules Kansas Ag-Gag Law Unconstitutional
Animal Legal Defense Fund-led coalition wins major victory for animal protection, food and worker safety, and the First AmendmentJanuary 22, 2020 Press Release
Related Cases
-
Challenging the USDA for Public Records of Inspection Process at Nonhuman Primates Research Facilities
Animal Legal Defense Fund and Rise for Animals v. United States Department of Agriculture
-
Compelling the USDA to Protect Primates Used in Research
New England Anti-Vivisection Society v. Goldentyer
-
Protecting Pigs from Cruel High-Speed Slaughter
Farm Sanctuary v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See More