How False Advertising Lawsuits Help Animals
As consumers become more aware of the cruelty in factory farming, more and more of them are seeking out and paying a premium for animal products produced in less abusive conditions. But some producers and retailers market their products in ways designed to trick consumers into believing that their products are “humane” even though they come from animals who suffer in industrialized factory farming facilities. This type of misleading labeling or advertising is sometimes referred to as “humane washing,” akin to the greenwashing of products to make them seem environmentally friendly.
When companies engage in humane washing, the Animal Legal Defense Fund files lawsuits to stop this misleading, illegal conduct — thereby protecting farmed animals and ensuring consumers can make choices based on truthful information.
Why is False Advertising Bad for Animals?
Even if companies don’t use false or misleading ads or packaging, almost all companies that raise and slaughter animals make statements on their websites about their “commitment” to “animal well-being” and animal care standards.
Most of these statements are purposefully vague and aspirational. They are also often deliberately misleading. They commandeer the concept of “animal welfare” as a term to describe adherence to inhumane standard industry practices, as opposed to the objectively higher standards consumers expect based on the company’s marketing.
Farmed animals raised throughout the meat, dairy, and egg industries are tragically exploited. Investigations and industry whistleblowers have revealed abuses on farms and in slaughterhouses so horrific that many people cannot even bear to witness them. While some malicious abuse violates the law, much of the cruelty consists of commonplace industry practices — such as physical mutilations without anesthesia and the use of body-gripping cages and crates — that, while imposing pain and suffering, are legally tolerated.
Many consumers want to avoid products from animals subjected to these cruel industry-standard conditions. Yet no federal law governs the conditions in which farmed animals are raised and most state anti-cruelty laws exempt standard agricultural practices. This sparse legal protection makes it especially easy to abuse animals raised for food and to conceal that abuse from consumers.
When companies misrepresent the way they raise and treat animals, it deprives consumers of the ability to drive the marketplace through informed purchasing decisions, and disadvantages competitors of more humanely produced food. False advertising allows “Big Ag” to maintain business as usual, preying on conscientious consumers with lies meant to conceal the factory farming origins of their meat, dairy, and eggs. This keeps more animals suffering in these facilities to meet the fraudulently inflated consumer demand. That’s why the Animal Legal Defense Fund works so hard to stop false advertising.
What You Can Do To Help
As consumers, you can question companies, demand truthful labeling and marketing, and become an informed consumer about what various labeling and marketing terms do and don’t mean. (One good tool is our Egg Labeling Regulations Guide.)
As long as the law fails to meaningfully protect farmed animals, you can help reduce their suffering by adopting a plant-based diet. Let lawmakers know that legal protections for all animals are important and that you want stronger protections for farmed animals enacted and enforced.
Meat industry request for preliminary injunction denied and animal protection coalition allowed to intervene in suit challenging constitutionality of Prevention of Cruelty to Farm Animals ActNovember 25, 2019 Press Release
The Animal Legal Defense Fund applauds Speaker Corey Johnson and the NYC Council for voting to end the sale of foie gras. Intro 1378, sponsored by Council Member Carlina Rivera, now moves to Mayor de Blasio, who is expected to sign the bill into law.October 30, 2019 News
The USDA violated federal law in finalizing this rule, acting contrary to the mountain of evidence before it demonstrating the rule’s dangers, and flouting humane slaughter and meat inspection laws.September 17, 2019 News