Urging the FDA to Regulate the Term “Natural”
The Animal Legal Defense Fund urged the FDA to protect consumers from misleading “natural” claims on meat products.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund submitted comments to the FDA calling on the agency to work with the USDA to prevent consumer deception from meat products bearing misleading “natural” labeling claims.
Status
Next Step
Case Closed
In 2016, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Center for Biological Diversity jointly submitted comments to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) calling on the agency to work with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to properly regulate the use of the term “natural” in the labeling of meat and poultry products.
We recommended that the term be defined in a way that aligns with what consumers reasonably believe “natural” to mean when it comes to the care and raising of farmed animals.
The comments argued that, to prevent a likelihood of consumer confusion, the FDA must prohibit the use of the “natural” claim on meat and poultry product labels when those products come from animals raised in ways that are anything but natural: when they are fed sub-therapeutic doses of antibiotics or other veterinary drugs, injected with growth hormones, and confined without any outdoor access, in spaces that prevent the animals from performing natural behaviors.
In its comments the Animal Legal Defense Fund called out Hormel Foods’ Natural Choice lunch meat and bacon products’ “natural” claims as particularly deceptive, due to the manner in which the animals sourced for the products were raised and the products were produced.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund is pursuing a separate consumer protection lawsuit against Hormel regarding their Natural Choice advertisements.
Donate to Protect Animals
Help animals win the legal protections they so desperately need and deserve, and ensure they have an advocate in courtrooms and legislatures across the country.
Recent News
-
Complaint Urges USDA to Investigate Puppy Mill Carrier for Deaths During Transport
Records obtained by the Animal Legal Defense Fund reveal puppy deaths and injuries in transport.June 11, 2024 Press Release -
Lawsuit Filed Demanding FDA Respond to Petitions Seeking to Ban Ractopamine
FDA’s approval for ractopamine relied primarily on safety studies conducted by the drugmaker.March 26, 2024 Press Release -
Legal Petition Urges USDA to Adopt Comprehensive Regulatory Framework for Wildlife Services Program
The Animal Legal Defense Fund, as part of a coalition, submitted a petition for rulemaking to the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service urging Wildlife Services to phase out lethal control of wild animals, including prohibiting specific practices such as neck snares, M-44 cyanide bombs, lead bullets, and more.November 21, 2023 Press Release
Related Cases
-
Challenging Hormel’s Deceptive Advertising Practices: Natural Choice®
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Hormel Foods Corporation
-
Exposing the Living Conditions of Hens Used by the Egg Industry
Matthew Hamity v California Department of Food and Agriculture
-
Seeking National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
USDA FOIA Request #FOIA-2015-00184
Looking for case and legal resources? View Resources
See More