Maryland Becomes Second State to Ban Retail Sales of Animals Sourced from Puppy and Kitten Mills
By Nicole Pallotta, Academic Outreach Manager
On April 24, 2018, Governor Larry Hogan signed into law HB 1662, the “No More Puppy-Mill Pups Act of 2018,” making Maryland the second state to ban the retail sale of dogs and cats obtained from commercial breeding facilities.
California was the first state to enact a similar ban in October 2017. Hundreds of North American cities and counties also have similar bans in place. These laws are an important tool in combating cruel large-scale animal breeding facilities like puppy and kitten mills.
According to Maryland’s new law, retail pet stores may only offer a dog or cat for sale if the animal is obtained from an animal protection organization, an animal control unit, the original breeder of the dog or cat, or a dealer that obtained the animal from the original breeder (if both breeder and dealer meet certain requirements). Outside of the above exceptions, “a retail pet store may not offer for sale or otherwise transfer or dispose of cats or dogs.”
Retail pet stores in Maryland have until January 1, 2020, to comply with the new law. California’s law is even stronger than Maryland’s in that it does not allow pet stores to sell companion animals obtained from breeders; only sales of animals obtained from public animal control agencies, shelters, or rescue groups are authorized. California’s law also includes rabbits. Although unsuccessful in their efforts, seven Maryland pet stores that will be affected by the new legislation lobbied against the bill.
As reported by the Washington Post:
… Del. Benjamin F. Kramer (D-Montgomery), the legislation’s sponsor and a longtime owner of adopted Doberman pinschers, called the commercial breeders that supply the stores “abominations” that lack “room for puppies to roam and for breeding dogs to play.”
Retail sales bans are part of the growing movement to fight against puppy and kitten mills, large-scale commercial breeding facilities that keep animals in poor conditions while mass-producing them for sale. Retail pet stores that sell live animals sourced from puppy and kitten mills (or from third party brokers who procure animals from these types of breeders) provide very little information to consumers about the origin of the animals. Federal standards for these facilities are notoriously lax, which has been an impetus for the passage of these so-called “retail pet sale ban” laws at the state and local level.
We are likely to see more retail pet sale laws enacted at the state and local level. Hundreds of communities have passed similar legislation, including major cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia – and the legislative trend shows no signs of slowing down. Just in 2018, about a dozen such new city laws have been enacted across the nation in Washington state, New Jersey, Florida, Georgia, Wyoming, and Minnesota, and many more are pending.
In addition to outright bans, puppy mills may be approached using several areas of the law. The Animal Legal Defense Fund is working across the country to combat commercial breeding facilities from multiple legal channels, including litigation to work toward improved conditions in puppy mills until they are outlawed completely.
In July 2017, the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a class action lawsuit against Petland, a national pet store chain, and the chain’s Kennesaw, Georgia location. In October 2017, we sued to shut down a puppy mill in Northern California. Finally, after Animal Legal Defense Fund and pro bono attorneys fought for years to get justice for consumers who unknowingly bought puppy-mill puppies from Barkworks pet stores, we were able to resolve that hard-fought lawsuit to the mutual satisfaction of the parties.
- Dance, Scott. “Selling dogs from ‘puppy mills’ prohibited by bill approved by Maryland legislature.” Baltimore Sun. April 7, 2018.
- Text of Maryland House Bill 1662 (“No More Puppy-Mill Pups Act of 2018”)
- Animal Legal Defense Fund. California Becomes First State to Ban Retail Sale of Companion Animals. December 7, 2017.
- Animal Legal Defense Fund. Cities Are Fighting Back Against Puppy Mills – But Some States Won’t Let Them. April 2, 2018.
- What is the Animal Legal Defense Fund doing about Puppy Mills?
Laws like California’s are part of a growing movement to combat large-scale commercial breeding facilities.December 7, 2017 Animal Law Update
The Animal Legal Defense Fund announced that a settlement agreement has been reached with the Animal Kingdom pet store in a high-profile lawsuit over a puppy laundering scheme to unlawfully circumvent the California "retail pet sale ban" — a law that bans the sale of dogs from commercial breeders, commonly called puppy mills.June 17, 2020 Press Release
This week, the Superior Court of California in Solano County found the owner of California Carolina Dogs, a puppy mill located in Vallejo, liable for violating the Polanco-Lockyer Pet Breeder Warranty Act following a lawsuit filed by the Animal Legal Defense Fund on behalf of Caru SPCA.June 3, 2020 Press Release