Court Rejects Attempt to Block California Law Banning Cruelest Farming Practices
Meat industry request for preliminary injunction denied and animal protection coalition allowed to intervene in suit challenging constitutionality of Prevention of Cruelty to Farm Animals Act
LOS ANGELES – On Friday, a Central District of California court denied a motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the pork and veal industries, which would have stopped California’s landmark farmed animal protection law from going into effect. The court also ruled that a coalition of animal protection organizations may intervene in the ongoing case to defend the law.
In 2018, Californians voted to strengthen the Prevention of Cruelty to Farm Animals Act — taking a major step toward eliminating from the state market some of animal agriculture’s cruelest practices. The law, adopted by voters as Proposition 12 (or Prop 12), builds upon previous farm animal measures in the state to prohibit the in-state production of certain pork, veal, and egg products if they come from cruelly confined animals. Prop 12 sets minimum space allowances for those animals, and prohibits the sale of products that do not meet this humane standard. The initiative passed easily with 63 percent of the vote.
In its lawsuit, the North American Meat Institute (NAMI) contends the California law violates the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause, attacking the state’s well-founded prerogative to protect animals and rid its marketplace of cruelly produced products. In Friday’s ruling denying the request for a preliminary injunction, the court found that NAMI had not established that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its challenge.
The ruling also granted intervention to Animal Legal Defense Fund, the Humane Society of the United States, Farm Sanctuary, Compassion in World Farming USA, Animal Equality, and The Humane League, which collectively filed a motion opposing the preliminary injunction and supporting the state of California in defending Prop 12’s constitutionality and preserving California’s right to ban the production and sale of cruelly produced animal products.
“California voted to enact the strongest protections for farmed animals in the country,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “The North American Meat Institute is trying to thwart Californians’ clear resolve. It is our intention to ensure Prop 12 remains the law.”
Farmed animals are the most abused animals, routinely subject to abusive conditions but with few legal protections. Animals in modern agriculture are treated more as a commodity than living, feeling beings. When standard industry practices — which affect billions of animals — include confining animals in cramped crates and cages for the duration of their lives with barely room to move, let alone go outdoors or engage in natural behaviors, laws like Prop 12 make significant progress.
For more information, visit aldf.org.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for issuing a final rule allowing pig slaughterhouses nationwide to police themselves and kill pigs at very high line speeds.January 13, 2020 News
The USDA violated federal law in finalizing this rule, acting contrary to the mountain of evidence before it demonstrating the rule’s dangers, and flouting humane slaughter and meat inspection laws.September 17, 2019 News
A dangerous bill, SB 1884, aimed at stopping whistleblowers from exposing animal cruelty is moving quickly through the Texas legislature. This bill has already passed the Texas Senate – your voice is urgently needed to prevent it from becoming law.May 21, 2019 Action Alert