Court Allows Lawsuit Against Texas Roadside Zoo to Proceed
First ruling pertaining to recently enacted Big Cat Public Safety Act
Contact: media@aldf.org
DALLAS — The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled in favor of the Animal Legal Defense Fund, denying another attempt by a Texas roadside zoo to dismiss allegations that the facility injures and kills lions, tigers, and other animals in violation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The court rejected the facility’s argument that the Big Cat Public Safety Act — a new federal law that governs the possession of certain animals — strips the roadside zoo’s lions and tigers of the protections they receive under the ESA, a different federal law that makes it unlawful for those animals to be injured or killed.
The lawsuit was originally filed by the Animal Legal Defense Fund in March 2022 against the roadside zoo, as well as its founder and former director, for violating the ESA’s “take” and “transfer” provisions by harming, harassing, and killing numerous animals — including nine lions and tigers who have died there since 2018 — and by transferring members of endangered and threatened species across state lines without the necessary permits.
The court’s decision marks the first time that a federal court has been asked to examine the coverage of the Big Cat Public Safety Act, which was signed into law in December 2022, as well as its interplay with other animal protection laws. The court found that while the Big Cat Public Safety Act “regulates who may lawfully own Big Cats,” the ESA “governs how Big Cats (and all endangered species) must be treated,” meaning that the Big Cat Public Safety Act provides “separate and heightened protections” for those animals.
“The court’s decision against the roadside zoo affirms how the Big Cat Public Safety Act — a critical law to protect big cats across the country — works alongside existing laws to strengthen them, such as the Endangered Species Act and Animal Welfare Act, without legally impeding their enforcement,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Managing Attorney Daniel Waltz.
In the lawsuit, the Animal Legal Defense Fund alleges that extensive photographic and video evidence, first-hand observations, and government analyses — including an official warning issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) — indicate that animals at the roadside zoo are mentally and physically suffering.
This is the first ruling issued related to the Big Cat Public Safety Act since its enactment on December 20, 2022. On June 9, 2023, the Department of Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service issued its first regulations pertaining to the Big Cat Public Safety Act that will facilitate the enforcement of the law.
To learn more about the case, visit aldf.org.
Focus Area
How We Work
Related
-
A Dog Named Smokey Reunites with Guardian After Being Kidnapped
The Animal Legal Defense Fund partnered with spcaLA to take custody of the dog until his guardian could retrieve himOctober 7, 2025 News -
Lawsuit to Proceed Against USDA for Issuing Animal Welfare Act License to Yellowstone Bear World
The complaint argues the wildlife park has violated the Animal Welfare Act on numerous occasions, including separating cubs prematurely from their mothersSeptember 19, 2025 News -
ALDF Partners with Advocates to Challenge EPA for Discarding Slaughterhouse Water Pollution Rules
10 Organizations petition federal court over EPA’s abandonment of rules to reduce pollution from meat processing industrySeptember 19, 2025 News