Fox

Banning Killing Contests (New Jersey)

Prohibits harassing or killing certain wildlife species at competitive events (S.1176 / A.1365)

S.1176/A.1365, championed by Senator Nilsa Cruz-Perez (D-5) and Assembly Member Daniel Benson (D-14), would prohibit harassing or killing certain wildlife at competitive events.

Updated

September 21, 2020

Work Type

Legislation

Status

Active

Killing contests are cruel and inhumane. Participants are awarded money and prizes for various categories for kills, usually for the largest, smallest, or greatest number of animals killed. Though these contests are often promoted as a means to reduce native wildlife populations, numerous studies prove that killing contests are an ineffective and misguided approach to controlling species’ populations.

S.1176/A.1365, championed by Senator Nilsa Cruz-Perez (D-5) and Assembly Member Daniel Benson (D-14), would prohibit harassing or killing certain wildlife at competitive events.

The New Jersey bill is part of a growing national movement to prohibit wildlife killing contests. Seven states have already enacted bans — Arizona, California, Colorado, Massachusetts, New Mexico, Vermont, and Washington.

Such contests have come under increasing scrutiny as especially egregious instances of wanton violence against animals occurs. Not only is this deeply cruel — it serves no wildlife management purpose. Furthermore, wildlife killing contests violate the public trust doctrine, which holds that a state’s wildlife is held in the public trust and managed for the benefit of all its citizens.

Learn more about wildlife killing contests.

Sign Up!

Join the Animal Legal Defense Fund's email list to stay up to date on lawsuits, legislation, and regulations affecting animals.

Sign Up Now