Washington Jury Awards Damages for “Intrinsic Value” and “Emotional Distress” Damages in Dog Shooting Case
By Nicole Pallotta, Academic Outreach Manager
In what is thought to be the largest verdict in Washington for the death of a dog, a jury has awarded $100,000 in a case involving the shooting death of Chucky, a springer spaniel whom owner Jim Anderson described as his “best friend.” Of that amount, $36,475 was awarded directly to Anderson for “intrinsic value” and “emotional distress.”
Anderson filed the civil lawsuit against his neighbor and family, one of whom shot Chucky during afternoon target practice and then attempted to cover it up. Chucky spent the night alone and gravely injured while Anderson desperately searched for him. When Anderson found Chucky the next morning he could not be saved; he died at the veterinary hospital. Anderson was represented by Bellingham animal lawyer Adam Karp.
This award is notable because noneconomic damages are not typically available in cases of wrongful death or injury to a companion animal. Although there have been some exceptions, compensation is typically limited to “fair market value” because animals are defined as property under the law. According to law professor David Favre, “… given the reality that many humans attach an emotional, personal value to their pets, the present position of the law that says that damages to property are primarily measured by the fair market value… constitutes a large disconnect between public expectations and the rules of property.” Cases like this may signal a shift by courts toward a more flexible analysis that differentiates between destruction of personal property and the death of a beloved animal.
Further reading:
- Lacitas, Erik. August 13, 2016. “Dog owner gets $100,000 settlement in shooting death of Chucky the spaniel.” Seattle Times.
- Plaintiff’s Trial Memorandum.
- Favre, David. 2010. “Living Property: A New Status for Animals Within the Legal System.” Marquette Law Review.
- See the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s resource, “What to do when your companion animal has been injured or killed.”
Focus Area
Issues
Related
-
Court Rules Craigslist Puppy Sellers Illegally Neglected Animals, Defrauded Families
Following a week-long trial in 2022, a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge issued a decision finding that Craigslist puppy traffickers committed animal neglect and fraud by selling fatally sick dogs to families.November 10, 2023 Press Release -
Washington Supreme Court Urged to Consider the True Value of Humans’ Relationship with Companion Animals
Animal Legal Defense Fund’s amicus brief urges the court to review a case regarding the negligent death of a dog and the resulting emotional damagesJune 5, 2023 Press Release -
Federal Lawmakers Reintroduced Goldie’s Act to Protect Dogs in Puppy Mills
Goldie’s Act would ensure the USDA does its job to protect dogs in federally licensed puppy millsMarch 24, 2023 Press Release