data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1513b/1513b52166054c707146750eb187801a461ff689" alt=""
Lawsuit Filed Against USDA for Approving Deceptive Chicken and Turkey Product Labeling
Perdue Farms and others are alleged to use idyllic imagery on products despite the reality of animals suffering on factory farms
Contact: media@aldf.org
WASHINGTON — Today, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF), along with two of its individual members, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to challenge its pattern and practice of approving chicken and turkey products without reviewing the imagery on the labels to ensure that it is not misleading to consumers despite the agency’s legal obligation to do so.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53aa1/53aa1870a157045c12a97f5c1f0757c81a94a800" alt=""
Filed Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
Animal Legal Defense Fund et al v. Rollins et al
The lawsuit specifically identifies the USDA’s approval of Perdue Farms’ Fresh Line labels, among others, which portray chickens and turkeys grazing outdoors in green grass under a bright sun. In reality, birds used in these products spend their entire lives confined in warehouses on factory farms. The agency is legally required to review labels of products containing turkey or chickens to ensure they are accurate. Yet it turned a blind eye toward the misleading imagery and approved Perdue Farms’ false pastoral labels. ALDF’s complaint identifies several other chicken and turkey product labels with imagery of animals in the verdant outdoors, and alleges that the USDA has similarly not reviewed these label images for accuracy.
Consumer concerns over the treatment of animals in animal agriculture have steadily increased over time. A Technomic survey found 77 percent of consumers are concerned about the welfare of animals used for food. More than two-thirds of consumers pay some or a lot of attention to food labeling claims regarding how the animal is raised.
“The USDA is responsible for reviewing food product labels so consumers can make informed decisions about the purchases they choose to make,” says ALDF Managing Attorney Daniel Waltz. “Regulations explicitly prohibit animal-product sellers from employing misleading marketing campaigns to sell products and ALDF will continue to pressure the federal government to protect the public from this harmful practice.”
The USDA’s decision to approve the labeling of Perdue Farms’ Fresh Line products is one example that reveals the agency’s failure to consider graphics when reviewing and approving labels on poultry products. By approving Perdue Farms’ Fresh Line labels without the review statutorily required by the Poultry Products Inspection Act, the USDA not only ignores the law it is charged with enforcing, but allows Perdue Farms and similar companies to mislead consumers about the nature of the products they are buying, hiding the inhumane conditions the birds endure.
A similar lawsuit was filed by ALDF against the FSIS in 2021 for approving misleading labels on products sold by Perdue Farms.
For more information, visit aldf.org.
Sign Up!
Join the Animal Legal Defense Fund's email list to stay up to date on lawsuits, legislation, and regulations affecting animals.
Focus Area
How We Work
Related
-
Bill Prohibiting Encounters with Wild Animals Introduced in California
Public contact with wild animals risks injury and the spread of diseaseFebruary 20, 2025 News -
$5,000 Reward Offered After Rabbits Targeted with Blow Darts in Washington State
Animal Legal Defense Fund offers reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person or people responsible for harming rabbits and other wildlife with blow dartsFebruary 4, 2025 Press Release -
West Virginia is the Only Remaining State That Doesn’t Ban Bestiality
The state is ranked 20th in the 2024 U.S. State Animal Protection Laws Ranking ReportJanuary 30, 2025 Press Release