Lawsuit Raises the Stakes in Food Fight Over the Term “Meat”
Coalition challenges constitutionality of recent Missouri legislative restrictions on products that use the term “meat” on their labels
Contact: Natalia Lima, firstname.lastname@example.org 679 7088
Jefferson City, Mo. – In a brazen attempt to stifle the growing grocery category of plant-based meat — and the coming market introduction of meat grown directly from cells without the need for raising and slaughtering animals, sometimes called “clean meat”— Missouri legislators passed a law that will prohibit “misrepresenting” any product as “meat” if it does not come from a slaughtered animal.
A coalition of organizations — including the ACLU of Missouri, the Animal Legal Defense Fund, the Good Food Institute, and plant-based meat powerhouse Tofurky — are challenging the law, which is scheduled to go into effect on August 28, 2018.
“As more and more consumers are making the conscious choice to remove animals from their plates, Missouri is putting its thumb on the scale to unfairly benefit the meat industry and silence alternative producers,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “This law violates various constitutional principles, including free speech — which should be a concern for everyone, regardless of diet.”
The complaint also alleges that the law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause by discriminating against out-of-state companies to protect in-state meat producers and the Due Process Clause by being so vague it’s impossible for companies to know what is and is not legal.
“Corporations – just like individuals – have the First Amendment right to free, truthful speech,” said ACLU of Missouri Legal Director Tony Rothert. “This law is unconstitutional because it makes truthful speech a crime.”
The explicit aim of the law is to protect the animal agriculture industry, as producers of meat products from slaughtered animals perceive a growing threat to their market share. The state’s consumer protection agency admits it has no evidence of consumer confusion over the labeling of plant-based meats.
But not all animal agriculture giants have dug in their heels. The largest and third-largest meat companies in the country, Tyson Foods and Cargill, have both invested in clean meat companies, and Tyson has invested in plant-based meat — which significantly reduce or eliminate the negative environmental impacts, animal cruelty, and public health risks that are associated with meat from slaughtered animals.
“Americans don’t like censorship, and they don’t like the government picking winners and losers in the marketplace,” explains GFI Executive Director Bruce Friedrich. “We’re confident that the Court will overturn this anti-competitive and unconstitutional law.”
Missouri passed a law that prohibits many products — including plant-based and cellular meat — from identifying themselves as “meat.” The new legislation, which became effective on August 28, 2018, carries criminal penalties of prison time and fines.November 8, 2018 Animal Law Update
Legally Brief: California Air Resources Board Commits to Regulate Methane Emissions by Dairy IndustryIn a momentous and long overdue shift in policy, partly in response to the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s advocacy, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) has formally committed to regulating the dairy industry’s greenhouse gas emissions.June 29, 2017 Legally Brief
The Animal Legal Defense Fund, in conjunction with other local and national groups, challenged the state of Oregon’s approval of a water-pollution permit for Lost Valley Farm, a mega dairy.June 27, 2017 News