Justice for KarleyPosted on January 6, 2010
April 2, 2010: Glynn Johnson, a former L.A. County assistant fire chief, was sentenced to 90 days in jail for beating Karley, a mixed breed shepherd puppy, so viciously that she had to be euthanized. He must also perform 400 hours of community service working with dogs, take anger management courses and repay veterinary bills.
Judges sometimes think that convicted animal abusers should carry out community service orders at an animal shelter – that this will somehow increase their respect for animals and the caretaker issues that are involved. It is ALDF’s position that convicted animal abusers have no place around a shelter’s rescued animals or its dedicated, often youthful, volunteers – not to mention that presenting animal care as a punishment (as opposed to a therapy) is more likely to induce resentment than compassion. Indeed, animal shelter administrations will often refuse to allow such orders to be carried out in their facilities.
Unfortunately, even in situations where there are felony convictions for heinous acts of cruelty, like Johnson’s vicious and fatal beating of his neighbors’ puppy Karley, light sentences can fail to deliver justice for animal victims and their families. While ALDF continues our work to push for tough sentencing in cases of animal abuse, you can take action now to protect yourself and your community by asking your legislator to support animal abuser registries for convicted felons like Glynn Johnson.
January 26, 2010: Glynn Johnson, a former L.A. County assistant fire chief, was found guilty of felony animal cruelty after he used a 12-pound rock to beat Karley, a mixed breed shepherd puppy, outside his Riverside, California home last year. Karley’s injuries from the vicious attack were so severe that she had to be euthanized. Johnson is scheduled to be sentenced on March 8 and could serve up to four years in state prison.
January 6, 2010
Why would a grown man, a leader in his community, purportedly beat a puppy so viciously that the dog would have to be euthanized? The Toole family has been asking this question since November 2008, when a neighbor repeatedly punched their six-month-old puppy, Karley, and struck her in the head with a large rock, shattering her skull. It’s a heartbreaking case that led Jeff and Shelley Toole to contact the Animal Legal Defense Fund for assistance. We’ve helped them by drafting legislation that could change the way California courts regard companion animals.
Authorities have charged Karley’s alleged attacker, Glynn Johnson, with felony animal cruelty for an assault witnesses say was unprovoked. They testified in a pre-trial hearing that after the puppy had run across his yard, Johnson, an assistant fire chief with Los Angeles County, discovered neighbor Travis Staggs taking Karley to the Toole’s home on the other side of his own property in an unincorporated area of Riverside, Calif. The defendant offered to walk Karley back to the Tooles himself, so Staggs turned the German shepherd mix over to him. “Then something in his head snapped and he started beating the dog,” Staggs told the court. He said that Johnson punched Karley with a closed fist about a dozen times and then beat her with an 11-inch rock, adding that he tried to stop the attack, but Johnson pushed him away.
Staggs said Johnson finally stopped hitting Karley after her body went limp; she then managed to stumble to a nearby ravine. The Toole’s teenage children, Brandon and Heather, rushed Karley to a veterinarian and later an animal intensive care unit, but her injuries were too extensive. In addition to her skull being cracked in three places, Karley lost an eye and suffered a broken jaw, crushed nasal cavity and a collapsed ear canal. “I’ve never seen a dog come in with that level of head injury,” says Angela Howard, DVM, one of the veterinarians who treated Karley. “I’ve seen pets who have been hit by cars and they were thrown by the car and suffered fractures to the nose or skull, but I’ve never seen a case where their head was that badly damaged.”
Johnson, who could face up to four years in prison if convicted, claims it’s a case of self-defense: Karley had bitten down on his thumb, he says, and the multiple blows he delivered to the puppy’s head were an effort to get her to release him. But Shelley Toole says Johnson has a history of violence and should be incarcerated. Unfortunately, though sheriff’s deputies responded to the crime scene shortly after the assault, Johnson was not immediately charged. “We wanted Mr. Johnson arrested,” says Toole. “One of our supporters told me about ALDF, and that they had attorneys who might be able to help. I went on the ALDF website to research what we could do and try to find answers to legal questions. I didn’t even have to call them ― the resources section on their site had all the answers we needed.”
Toole says she was shocked to discover that the law considers animals to be property. “Animals are not chairs or tables,” she says. “They are living, breathing beings with feelings, and they are part of a family. Sadly, there is no civil law for the victims of animal cruelty in California.” She and her family are dedicated to changing that, not only to honor Karley’s memory, but to aid future victims of abuse. Stephan Otto, ALDF’s legislative director, worked with the Tooles to draft “Karley’s Law,” a Civil Right of Action for Cruelty to an Animal, which will give parties whose animals are subjected to acts of cruelty the opportunity to bring a civil action against the perpetrator for the full range of their loss. The law won’t change an animal’s legal status as property, but if a plaintiff prevails, it will give courts the authority to order a judgment for all actual and reasonable damages proved, such as the monetary value of the animal, veterinary expenses, emotional distress, loss of companionship, court
costs and attorney’s fees. Karley’s Law will also provide punitive damages of at least $1,000 for every intentional act to which the animal was subjected, as well as give courts the authority to issue restraining orders and other injunctive relief as they deem warranted.
“As it stands now,” says Otto, “collecting an animal’s market value ― what it would cost to replace him or her — is generally all that’s available to plaintiffs in the state, so Karley’s Law would be a real step forward. It doesn’t guarantee any damages, but it will allow animal guardians their day in court to argue for the full extent of their loss.”
Though new laws won’t bring Karley back, they’ll aid future generations of animals and bring a little comfort to the Tooles. “The Tooles are the perfect example of individuals who realize that they can do something in memory of an animal ― something that’s productive and that will benefit all animals in California,” says Otto.
“The senseless tragedy of what happened to Karley is still in our mind every day,” says Toole. “Through Karley and our efforts, maybe other animals’ lives will be saved from cruelty. Maybe after the trial we can move forward, and maybe in time we will heal, but how do you ever forget such a horrible act of violence and how much Karley suffered? The nightmares haven’t gone away.”
The family, which has relocated, set up a website for Karley and her supporters: www.justice4karley.com.