The Animal Legal Defense Fund, PETA File for Summary Judgment in Utah ‘Ag-Gag’ Case

Posted on June 1, 2016

Animal Rights Groups Stand Up for the First Amendment and Transparency and Seek to Repeat Victory from Idaho ‘Ag-Gag’ Case

For Immediate Release

Contact:

Natalia Lima, Animal Legal Defense Fund, nlima@aldf.org, (201) 679-7088
Matthew Strugar, PETA Foundation, MatthewS@petaf.org, (646)797-1853

cows-cc-jelle-s-squareSALT LAKE CITY — Yesterday the Animal Legal Defense Fund, PETA, and Salt Lake City resident Amy Meyer filed a motion for summary judgment in their challenge to Utah’s notorious Ag-Gag law, seeking to have the law formally struck down as unconstitutional.

This lawsuit was the first in the nation to challenge ‘Ag-Gag’ laws, which criminalize undercover investigations by animal rights activists and journalists at factory farms and slaughterhouses.  The lawsuit was filed in 2013 alleging that Utah’s Ag-Gag law violates the constitutional guarantees of free speech and equal protection.

After filing this challenge to the Utah law, the Plaintiffs also challenged Idaho’s Ag-Gag law. The Idaho case was swiftly and decisively resolved in favor of the Plaintiffs, with the federal court holding that Ag-Gag laws like those in Utah and Idaho “suppress speech by undercover investigators and whistleblowers concerning topics of great public importance: the safety of the public food supply, the safety of agricultural workers, the treatment and health of farm animals, and the impact of business activities on the environment.”

Plaintiffs are now seeking a formal declaration that the Utah Ag-Gag law is also unconstitutional. It has already been determined by a federal judge that laws impeding whistleblowing in the realm of food production run afoul of the constitution, and the summary judgment motion filed today is intended to formally extend this reasoning to Utah.

“The Utah Ag-Gag law, no less than the Idaho one, is an affront to the First Amendment’s promise of free speech, to say nothing of our societal commitment to free and open debate and transparency,” says Stephen Wells, Executive Director of the Animal Legal Defense Fund.

“It’s egregiously unconstitutional to allow Big Agriculture to keep cruelty to animals a secret,” says PETA Director of Litigation Matthew Strugar. “The Idaho courts have spoken, and now it’s time for Utah to confirm that PETA and others have a right to expose criminal abuse.”

###

About the Animal Legal Defense Fund

The Animal Legal Defense Fund was founded in 1979 to protect the lives and advance the interests of animals through the legal system. To accomplish this mission, the Animal Legal Defense Fund files high-impact lawsuits to protect animals from harm; provides free legal assistance and training to prosecutors to assure that animal abusers are punished for their crimes; supports tough animal protection legislation and fights harmful legislation; and provides resources and opportunities to law students and professionals to advance the emerging field of animal law. For more information, please visit aldf.org.

About PETA

Founded in 1980, PETA is the largest animal rights organization in the world, with more than 5 million members and supporters worldwide. PETA uses public education, cruelty investigations, celebrity involvement, protest campaigns, and other innovative tactics to spread the message that animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or to abuse in any other way. For more information, please visit PETA.org.

 

Tags:

Be a Partner in Protection!

Donate monthly to help animals.

or make a one-time gift »

ALDF's Online Store

Help fund our lifesaving work!

shop

Stay Connected

Sign up for Action Alerts.


Join Us

Follow ALDF on these networks:

Stay Connected

Sign up for Action Alerts.