From the State That Gave Us Michael Vick, Here is Another Insulting Slap on the Wrist

Posted by Scott Heiser, Director of ALDF's Criminal Justice Program on June 2, 2008

Undercover investigation video of Horton's PupsHarkin
back to November of 2007, to Hillsville, Virginia, where Carroll County
officials had to declare a state of emergency to deal with the more
than 1,000 dogs seized from Lanzie Horton, Jr. (d/b/a Horton’s Pups)
and commonly know as "Junior," due to allegations of neglect during the
administration of what was one of the largest puppy mill busts in the
United States. Recall that while the case was pending, a Horton’s Pups agent (Junior’s father) told local media
that if his son’s puppy mill license was revoked, they (the Horton
family) had plenty of other family members that would secure a
breeder’s license and that there was no way that the Humane Society was
going to shut them down. Junior’s dad even told the local media that
they were going to "rub the Humane Society’s nose in it."

Now, fast forward to May 16, 2008, where Junior
Horton had his first trial in the Virginian General District Court
(Virginia’s General District Courts are limited jurisdiction courts–no
official record or transcript of the proceedings is kept and
unsuccessful defendants have the right, upon conviction, to appeal de
novo to the circuit court for a second, "real" trial, on the record).
After learning of his conviction on all 40 counts (14 cruelty charges,
25 neglect charges and one licensing violation) Junior announced at the
conclusion of his bench trial before judge Edward Turner, that he would
appeal his case. However, in assessing the sentence imposed by Judge
Turner, one has to ask Junior why?

To the uninitiated, the sentence might sound rather harsh.
After all, there is mention of 12 years of prison and fines of up to
$2,500 per count (totally more than $47,000). However, Judge Turner
suspended the entire 12-year jail term–meaning Junior does not have
serve a single day of jail. Moreover, of the more than $47,000 in
pronounced fines, all but $4,750 was suspended–meaning Junior pays
$4,750 in fines, NOT $47,000 in fines. And the final straw: Judge
Turner made a judicial finding that, in Judge Turner’s view, Junior
isn’t a cruel man and promptly refused to shut down Horton’s operation.
To his credit, the court did cap the number of dogs Junior could
possess to 250.

The sentence in this case is yet another classic
example of how out of touch trial judges can be when it comes to animal
cruelty cases. Change the subject matter of this case from exploited,
live victims with the capacity to suffer and substitute oh, I don’t
know, say guns or controlled substances and assume that Junior had a
license to sell said guns or controlled substances. Would the judge
allow Junior to continue to sell the regulated item in the wake of
these types of abuses of the license? I doubt it. Would the court
suspend the entire term of incarceration? I doubt that as well. Would
the court make a character finding in favor of the offender? Not
likely. This sentence out of Hillsville, Virginia, coupled with the
November, 2007, re-election of Gerald Poindexter, the Surry County
prosecutor who completely botched the State’s dogfighting case against
Michael Vick (recall that the Feds had to step in) and one has to
wonder what the voters of Virginia are thinking.

To be fair to the voters of Virginia, I must concede that the General Assembly did pass a reasonably good anti-puppy mill bill (H.B. 538)
in March of this year, which the governor not only signed but also
accelerated the effective date by moving it up from July 2009 to
January of 2009 (the Governor even struck the language making the bill
unenforceable unless the state put public money behind it during the
2008 session–which would have likely rendered it a hollow act given the
tanking economy)… This fact is redeeming for the people of Virginia,
but only further underscores the poor decision making of Judge Turner
in sentencing Junior to what amounts to a slap on the wrist.