Encouraging Citizens to Act Outside the LawPosted by Carter Dillard, ALDF's Director of Litigation on July 3, 2012
On July 1, 2012 California’s ban on the production and sale of foie gras, which is the grossly enlarged liver of force-fed ducks, went into effect. To make foie gras a feeding tube is jammed down ducks’ esophagi, and food is pumped into the ducks’ digestive system over a period of weeks until their livers swell ten or more time their normal size. By the time the ducks are killed they are suffering and gravely ill, essentially dying from liver failure.
The California ban is a basic prohibition on torturing animals to make them taste better. That is why I was shocked to hear statements by several California officials, including police and some animal control officers, suggesting they would not enforce the ban, or that they would interpret the ban loosely to ignore the legislature’s clear intent to protect ducks from abuse.
These comments are shocking because state and local officials, who make a living off of taxpayers and are entrusted with a duty to uphold the law, are playing right into the hands of animal activists that say the legal system does nothing good for animals, that it is a waste of time, and that one must go outside the law to actually do something for animals. As an attorney and Director of Litigation for the Animal Legal Defense Fund I have chosen to work inside the law. But I constantly hear arguments from activists who say we are wasting our time, that even if we are successful in getting laws passed they will never be enforced, and worse yet that we are wasting donors’ hard-earned money and giving animal lovers a false sense of progress. At ALDF we do our best to show these activists that they are mistaken, that working within the legal system helps animals.
These scofflaw officials are doing their best to prove us wrong and are encouraging citizens to work outside of the law. That makes our jobs, those who actually work to help animals within the system, that much harder. Laws that protect animals, our most vulnerable population, are meant to be enforced. Anything less threatens the very system we humans depend upon and invites vigilante tactics no official should want.