Animal Agriculture Is Hiding Information…Again

Posted by Nicole Roth, ALDF Board Member on April 29, 2013

The Animal Agriculture Alliance (“AAA”) is holding a conference in Arlington, Virginia on May 1st and 2nd called “Activists at the Door: Protecting Animals, Farms, Food & Consumer Confidence.” Judging by the title of the conference, one would think the purpose of the conference is to protect animals, farms, food, and consumer confidence. Why then is the AAA then prescreening all registrants and denying attendance to members of the public willing to pay their $425 registration fee? This is a question I was forced to ask myself when my registration this week was rejected.

I received an email from Emily Metz Meredith, the Communications Director for AAA stating the following:

Dear Ms. Roth,

I have received your registration for the 12th Annual Animal Agriculture Alliance Stakeholders Summit in May; however, your registration has been declined and your credit card has not been charged.

As it clearly states on our registration page, “To ensure that this Summit provides an optimal educational experience for all attendees, your registration is subject to the Animal Agriculture Alliance’s final approval,” we reserve the right to deny registration to anyone who we feel will not aid our organization and industry stakeholders in positive, collaborative discourse.

The speakers’ presentations on May 1, 2013 will be streaming live, and information about where to view the live feed will be made available on our website closer to the date of the Summit.
Thank you for your interest.

Emily Metz Meredith
Communications Director
Animal Agriculture Alliance

Ms. Meredith did not give me a reason for declining my registration and rejecting my money. My guess is someone at the AAA is conducting background checks on everyone applying to the conference to ensure that the information provided at the conference does not get into the hands of the public. Why else would an attorney, mom of two, with no criminal record or history of civil disobedience be denied access? Maybe it is because I am on the Board of Directors of the Animal Legal Defense Fund. Not only is the AAA prohibiting law abiding citizens like myself access to the conference, the AAA has also denied press passes to reporters known to critique their practices. Reporter Will Potter, author of Green Is The New Red, was similarly denied access. It would seem that the AAA is going to some length to ensure that people with strong voices on one side of the issue are not in the room for their conferences. That might make sense if the AAA’s agenda is to protect the businesses and profits of the agriculture industry. If they want to protect consumers, food, and animals, as they claim, then sharing information and having an intelligent debate would better serve their interests.

You may say “But she said the presentations will be streamed live! How can they be hiding information?” Well, the AAA supposedly recorded the conference last year and made the presentations available to the public but significant portions of the conference are not available. For example, a presentation on “Communicating Shared Values Across the Food Chain” was scheduled to last an hour during the 2012 conference but the video available to the public is only 22:11 minutes long. Similarly, a panel on “Agriculture’s Voice in Today’s Media” was scheduled for an hour and a half yet the videos available to the public are only 16:30 and 27:08 minutes long. You can check out similar inconsistencies yourself, including entire missing presentations. The 2012 schedule is available here, and the videos of the 2012 conference are available here. Forgive me for not trusting the AAA that the conference presentations will be not be similarly edited this year. 

The Animal Agriculture Alliance is a coalition of individuals and businesses involved in animal agriculture. They claim their members are “interested in helping consumers better understand the role animal agriculture plays in providing a safe, abundant food supply to a hungry world.” I am a consumer. Why am I not allowed to attend the conference to “better understand” animal agriculture? Last year’s AAA conference attendees were urged to “open the barn doors and showcase the importance of modern food production.” How is denying access to the conference “opening the barn doors?”

In reality, the AAA and the animal agriculture industry is doing everything in its power to ensure that we do not see inside the barns (or, more accurately, inside the warehouses) which house almost 10 billion farm animals in the United States yearly.  The animal agriculture industry has pushed 11 states to introduce ag gag bills aimed at criminalizing undercover investigations and silencing individuals who expose cruel, corrupt, and even illegal practices at factory farms and slaughterhouses.  AAA’s Communications Director, Emily Meredith, (the same person who denied my access to the conference) has been debating the ag gag bills in the media stating that the animal agriculture industry is “transparent” and these bills are designed to make information about animal abuse in the agriculture industry public as soon as it occurs. In reality, these bills would prevent undercover investigations resulting in criminal convictions for animal cruelty such as the recent Wyoming convictions of workers at a Tyson Foods supplier and the North Carolina convictions of workers at a Butterball Turkey farm because they would prevent the documentation of systemic abuse which lead to higher penalties.

Rather than focusing on how to prevent cruelty, the animal agriculture industry is focused on how to cover it up. Out of 12 presentations scheduled for the 2013 Animal Agriculture Alliance Conference, not one deals with how to prevent problems like animal cruelty from occurring. Instead, the animal agriculture industry wants to talk about how to prevent the information of animal cruelty from going public and how to manage the ensuing crisis when that information goes public. Why not make all of the animal agriculture industry’s practices transparent and see what the public thinks? Consumers deserve to know how their food is produced and animals deserve to be treated humanely.


4 thoughts on “Animal Agriculture Is Hiding Information…Again

  1. linda b says:

    While disappointing, this is NOT a surprise….

    ALL the more reason to support ALDF’s efforts to safeguard conditions for animals…. the public deserves to know the truth.

  2. linda b says:

    While disappointing, this is NOT a surprise….

    ALL the more reason to support ALDF’s efforts to safeguard conditions for animals…. the public deserves to know the truth.

  3. Nicole Roth says:

    The conference started today at 8:00 am EST. Despite Ms. Meredith’s claims that the conference would be streaming live, it is not. You can check it out for yourself on their webpage: http://www.animalagalliance.org/summit/index.cfm?PageID=645.

  4. Mark Pruitt says:

    It was streaming live for the first session, I watched it. The USDA’s monkey was talking, not too confidently I might ad.