Blog

The Modern Savage: Our Unthinking Decision to Eat Animals


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on April 1, 2015

happy-pig-cc-yamal-article-image-500

Pig at Woodstock Animal Santuary. (CC Y’amal)

James McWilliams’ new book, The Modern Savage: Our Unthinking Decision to Eat Animals, is an ethical consideration of the reality of animal agriculture. And the reality is cruelty to animals exists on smaller, so-called “humane” farms as well as on industrial-scale “factory farms.” Compassionate omnivores may wish to believe otherwise—and that desire is targeted by phrases like “cage-free,” “free range,” “grass-fed,” “local,” “organic,” “sustainable,” which are co-opted by the animal ag industry. These labels deceive conscientious consumers and reinforce the dominance of the industry, rather than undermine it. The Modern Savage challenges these notions about eating animals at a fundamental level.

modern-savageResearching and writing about contemporary food trends for 10 years, Professor McWilliams has seen a groundswell of resistance toward industrial animal agriculture. “That’s a positive development,” he explains, “but to really take on the industry you have to take on the idea of eating animals.” McWilliams is a professor at Texas State University, San Marcos, and has a Ph.D. in history from Johns Hopkins University. He is a long-time journalist and runs the acclaimed blog Eating Plants.

McWilliams explains that people buy into the hype of sustainable alternatives through slick “greenwashing” marketing campaigns. A recent commercial series from McDonald’s, “Loving is Local,” waxes nostalgic, using the backdrop of Petaluma, California, a historic town near ALDF’s national headquarters. Images of quaint small-town life, a shopkeeper sweeping his sidewalk, and rolling green hills, promote McDonald’s’ colossal-scale corporate produced animal products. Yet McDonald’s is the antithesis of local: the franchise sells animal products trucked in from thousands of miles away, and boasts of serving “billions” around the world, with twice as many outlets outside the U.S. as within.

The sustainable movement’s mythology also “allows for favoring soil over sentience,” McWilliams notes. “These sustainable ideas are in no way radical because they won’t make the radical leap of taking on animal agriculture. What they become is a marketing arm for industrial agriculture.”

The Modern Savage turns Michael Pollan’s famous work The Omnivore’s Dilemma on its head. Instead, James McWilliams refers to the “omnivore’s contradiction.” How is it, he asks, that advocates of so-called “humane” meat “justify on the one hand the restructuring of agriculture to accommodate an animals’ interests and then on the other hand slaughter the animal?”

In this way, The Modern Savage lodges a fatal blow at smaller-scale farms and backyard butchering. Amateur farmers can be incompetent, and McWilliams presents horrific evidence of botched slaughters.

mcwilliams-2015-twitter2-quote-website-body-image

One of the most dramatic examples is adopting pigs as pets while voicing a fetish for bacon. “This cognitive dissonance obscures the obvious moral contradiction,” McWilliams says. Another example is the terminology used to describe bunnies: “pet” rabbits and “meat” rabbits. “We use language to create false dichotomies and fool ourselves with our own rhetoric. It’s inconvenient to question that.” But, “when it comes to raising animals as food, this means turning an emotional being into an object.”

McWilliams is one of several plaintiffs in the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s groundbreaking lawsuit against the state of Idaho’s unconstitutional ag gag statute. This law aims to prevent the documentation of illegal animal abuse on factory farms, and exposés by investigative journalists like McWilliams. In fact, that transparency—so feared by the industry—is what compassionate consumers want most.

Want to read more of The Modern Savage? Enter ALDF’s free giveaway contest by filling out this form—two lucky winners will be chosen at random to receive a copy of this book along with some ALDF goodies!

Keep the conversation going, and share your questions and comments on Goodreads!

No Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Speak Out for Farmed Animals in Your Community


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on April 1, 2015

Want to speak out for farmed animals directly to your community? Letters to the editor are a powerful way to make your voice for heard within your larger community. These letters are one of the most widely-read sections of the newspaper. Elected officials often take notice of public opinion.

Visit ALDF’s Letter to the Editor Action Center—our personalized online resource helps you easily connect with local newspapers in your area!

peets-chick-article-image-500px

Take Action Button

For example, ALDF Executive Director Stephen Wells, wrote a letter to the editor about the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s failure to regulate slaughterhouses that appeared in a local paper.

EDITOR: As noted in Tuesday’s paper, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has refused to respond to reports of an intimate relationship between a USDA inspector and a Petaluma slaughterhouse employee (“Answers sought in Rancho closure”). Early this year, federal regulators ordered a nationwide recall of 8.7 million pounds of beef from the Rancho Feeding Corp., and they shut the facility down in February. Although Reps. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, and Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, have called on the USDA to provide answers, the agency is using the cover of “pending investigation” to shroud itself in secrecy.

Unfortunately, the animal agriculture industry regularly colludes with government agencies including the USDA to hide operations from the public. Meanwhile, the understaffed USDA often fails to enforce the law, putting the public at grave risk. That’s why the Cotati-based Animal Legal Defense Fund, supported by a broad coalition of public interest groups, filed the nation’s first lawsuits against state “ag gag” laws (in Idaho and Utah) that silence whistleblowers on factory farms and slaughterhouses. The industry talks about transparency while shutting the public out at every opportunity. Taxpayers deserve some answers.

STEPHEN WELLS
Executive Director, Animal Legal Defense Fund

If you’d like to speak out for farmed animals, here are suggested topics to consider:

1 Comment  |  Leave A Comment

Working Together to Combat Factory Farming: ALDF’s Los Angeles Animal Law Symposium


Posted by Nicole Pallotta, ALDF Student Programs Coordinator on March 31, 2015

On Saturday, March 28, more than 150 attorneys, law students, and animal advocates came together to attend the first symposium of the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s Los Angeles regional attorney network, where top experts discussed legal and grassroots strategies to challenge the harmful impacts of factory farming on animals, humans, and the environment. The sold-out event took place at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, and was co-hosted by USC’s Student Animal Legal Defense Fund (SALDF) chapter.

steve-USC-law-school-dean-article-image-500px

Robert K. Rasmussen, dean of USC Law School, and Stephen Wells, executive director of ALDF.

The day began by addressing the suffering of animals in factory farms; with almost every natural instinct denied to them, these sensitive, sentient beings experience what ALDF director of litigation Carter Dillard called “psychological torture.” And the torment is not only psychological: customary farming practices, exempt from most anti-cruelty laws and defined by the industry itself, involve mutilating animals’ bodies with no pain relief. No federal laws govern the conditions in which farmed animals are raised.

After Pamela Hart, ALDF Animal Law Program director, gave an overview of these practices, Carter spoke about ways to combat common hurdles to using litigation on behalf of animals in factory farms. ALDF director of legislative affairs Chris Green gave an update on anti-whistle-blower ag gag legislation and other relevant federal and state laws.

steve-USC-law-school-dean-article-image-500

ALDF staff Chris Green, Carter Dillard, T.J. Tumasse, and Pamela Hart.

Next, ALDF manager of investigations TJ Tumasse spoke of the routine abuse he witnessed as an undercover investigator in factory farms and slaughterhouses, being sure to remind the audience that the abhorrent treatment he saw every day represented the inherent cruelty of the industry, rather than the actions of a few “bad apple” workers (although he also witnessed individual acts of cruelty against helpless animals all too often). When he talked about newborn piglets entering the world “in a state of what could only be described as jubilation,” only to have their world shortly dissolve into terror and pain upon meeting their first human, many were fighting back tears.

Still drying my tears, I found Beyond Meat CEO and co-founder Ethan Brown’s keynote presentation inspiring and uplifting. He talked about his company’s mission to use technology and innovation to help animals by creating better plant-based “meat” products that will revolutionize the future of food and replace animal agriculture. With investors like Bill Gates, Beyond Meat’s future—and the possibility of animal-free meat products that will save animals, the environment, and our health—looks bright.

Stephen Wells of ALDF and Ethan Brown of Beyond Meat at our recent Animal Law Symposium. #beyondmeat #poweredbyplants #protein #aldf

A photo posted by Animal Legal Defense Fund (@animallegaldefensefund) on

Afternoon panelists addressed the environmental devastation caused by factory farms, human health risks posed by food borne pathogens and overuse of antibiotics, and possible avenues to effect positive change on both these wide fronts. Investigative journalist Will Potter closed the day with a keynote address about his mission to inform people of the reality of factory farms—compared to persistent cultural myths about farming—through his reporting. A networking reception followed the symposium, allowing attendees (which included student representatives from at least 10 different SALDF chapters) to continue the conversation.

pam-and-nicole-500px

Pam Hart and Nicole Pallotta.

Attendees left the symposium armed with new knowledge, strategies, and connections, and we look forward to having more events like this in the future. One of the most important messages of the day was that various constituencies can, and must, work together to combat factory farms. Due to the vast scope of the problem and its wide-ranging impacts, a multi-pronged and collaborative approach is absolutely necessary to dismantle the structure of industrial animal agriculture. Factory farming is a formidable foe, but we must continue our fight. The animals are depending on us.

2 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Undercover Investigations Help Protect Farmed Animals


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 31, 2015

Undercover investigations at factory farms are central to building cases against animal abusers and those who profit from the exploitation of animals. Evidence obtained from undercover investigations has been used by prosecutors and law enforcement and led to criminal prosecutions. Investigations have also led to massive food recalls after food safety violations were documented. And in other cases, investigations have inspired the passage of humane laws.

Meet T.J. Tumasse, ALDF’s manager of investigations for our brand new investigations unit. For years, T.J. did what most people couldn’t stomach for a day or even an hour—he went undercover on factory farms and slaughterhouses to gather evidence of illegal animal cruelty, and helped secure a felony animal cruelty conviction for an animal abuser.

As T.J. knows, animal abuse on factory farms doesn’t come down to a few bad apples—though the industry would like us to believe that. The abuse of animals on factory farms is standard industry practice; that’s why they want to keep it secret, and that’s why we need undercover investigators. We won’t let these abusers break the law and shut the public out.

Here’s how you can take action for farmed animals during Speak Out for Farmed Animals Week:

Check back in tomorrow for more ways you can speak out for farmed animals.

12 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Speak Out for Farmed Animals Week!


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 30, 2015

Today marks the beginning of Speak Out for Farmed Animals Week, ALDF’s national week of action aimed at drawing attention to the plight of farmed animals who are raised and slaughtered for their flesh. Across the country, advocates are joining in the campaign. What will you do to help?

speak-out-for-farmed-animals-500px

Click this image to share on Facebook, or download to share on the social network of your choice.

Animal lovers advocate for all animals. We protect the dogs and cats and bunnies and horses we share our daily lives with and respect the wild animals whose mysterious, autonomous lives ask us to leave them alone. We also speak up for the billions of cows, pigs, chickens, goats, sheep, and turkeys we call farmed animals.

Where the law fails them, the Animal Legal Defense Fund works hard to close loopholes, enforce protection laws, and create better, more effective laws. But you might be shocked to learn just how much the law fails farmed animals and how much we’ve got our work cut out for us.

  • No federal laws govern the condition in which farmed animals are raised.
  • And most state anti-cruelty laws exempt farmed animals from criminal statutes of protection.

Animals suffer unspeakable cruelty in industrial agriculture (“factory farms”) and on smaller farms, too. When it comes to the law, farmed animals are vulnerable, unprotected, and exploited as the meat, dairy, and egg industries trade horrific cruelty for high profits. This is also true at facilities that take advantage of well-meaning consumers by calling themselves “humane.”

Investigations and industry whistle-blowers have revealed abuse so horrific most people can’t stomach even hearing about it. The horrors revealed by undercover investigations are the number one reason people give for not consuming animal products. After seeing what these animals go through, many people choose not to contribute to the problem.

Farmed animals can’t speak up for themselves. Their suffering is hidden behind closed doors to shield industry from public outrage. These animals are closely quartered, kept in filth, tortured, sliced, diced, and served up like objects, and they deserve all of us to speak up for them and demand better laws.

  • 10 billion farmed animals are raised and slaughtered in the U.S. alone, every year.
  • 55 billion land animals are killed globally by animal agriculture.
  • As the Earth’s population explodes, these numbers could double by the end of the century.

Now more than ever, it is time for us to speak out for farmed animals. What will you do to help? Tell us on social media and #SpeakOut for farmed animals today—and spread the word through ALDF’s Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram pages.

Ideas for today:

22 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Army Corps to Blow Cormorants Out of the Sky—Can You Help?


Posted by Kelsey Eberly, ALDF Litigation Fellow on March 24, 2015

On Friday, March 20, the Army Corps of Engineers announced its final decision to go forward with a “management plan” that calls for the slaughter of nearly 11,000 double-crested cormorants and the destruction of over 26,000 cormorant nests on East Sand Island, at the mouth of the Pacific Northwest’s Columbia River. The Audubon Society of Portland has been tracking this lethal control plan since it was first announced, commenting during the environmental review, spreading the word, and mobilizing bird lovers to speak out against it.

If you are a lover of the Columbia River’s birds, the Animal Legal Defense Fund needs your help in putting a stop to this slaughter.

cormarands-cc-Brocken-Inaglory-article-image-500px

The cormorants will be blown out of the sky with shotguns and shot at close range with rifles as they glide over the water, gathering food for their hatchlings on the island. All told, the federal government’s plan calls for mowing down more than half of East Sand Island’s cormorants—the largest colony of these birds in the western United States. This represents the killing of 15% of the entire population west of the Rockies.

The Corps’ plan is a misguided and scientifically suspect attempt to mitigate the precipitous decline of protected salmon species in the region. Rather than attack the root causes of salmon loss—habitat loss, over development, and the Corps’ own management of the Columbia River Hydropower System—the federal government has scapegoated the birds for doing what comes naturally: eating fish.

During the environmental review process, the Corps received over 145,000 comments opposing its lethal management plan, with over 98% of commenters voicing opposition to lethal control. ALDF joined this chorus, calling on the Corps to thoroughly analyze the panoply of human-caused impacts on salmon populations, and to engage in a bioethical review of how to manage the bird and fish species.

However, despite this overwhelming public opposition, and the lack of any scientific basis for the hypothesis that blasting cormorants out of the sky will lead salmon populations to rebound, the Corps’ lethal management plan is moving forward. Their narrow-minded calculation pits one protected species against another in a zero-sum game. That’s not conservation; it’s a massacre.

ALDF is calling for the planned slaughter of cormorants to be halted—and we need your help to hold the Corps accountable. Are you a bird-lover or bird-watcher? Have you visited the area and seen the cormorants in the Columbia River estuary? If so, please contact ALDF immediately, at legalcase@aldf.org.

Tags:
86 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Lolita’s Safety and Well-Being Leads Advocates to Appeal to Court for Her Protection


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 24, 2015

On behalf of the Animal Legal Defense Fund, PETA, and Orca Network, animal law attorneys will be in court today to advocate for Lolita, a lonely orca trapped in the smallest orca tank in North America, at the infamous Miami Seaquarium. The Seaquarium has blatantly violated the federal Animal Welfare Act, which governs protections for Lolita. Yet its license has been rubber-stamped repeatedly despite the illegal and wretched conditions in which Lolita is held. She is trapped in the equivalent of a bathtub, year after year, with no orca companion or shelter from the sun and other weather conditions.

lolita-article-image-500px

Today, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Miami will hear oral argument in the groups’ lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for renewing the Seaquarium’s license despite knowing that the facility is perpetually in violation of at least three regulations of the federal Animal Welfare Act. The groups’ lawsuit against the USDA was dismissed in March 2014. An appeal was filed last June.

The law is certainly on Lolita’s side. She is not only protected by the Animal Welfare Act, but also the Endangered Species Act. In February 2015, advocates cheered when the National Marine Fisheries Service, as a result of a petition by ALDF, PETA, and Orca Network, granted Lolita the same protections under the Endangered Species Act that protect her family in the wild. Yet she is still swimming endless circles in the pathetic conditions at the Seaquarium.

Despite the legal protection Lolita is entitled to under the Animal Welfare Act, however, the USDA has failed to enforce the law.

What does this mean for Lolita? It means our government is allowing the Seaquarium to abuse an endangered species, by rubber-stamping the park’s license no matter what conditions Lolita suffers, or how many times the park breaks the law.

Lolita was originally kidnapped from her family in the horrific 1970 Penn Cove roundup in Puget Sound. In the wild, orcas spend their entire lives with their mothers. Lolita’s mother still thrives in a seaside sanctuary off the coast of Washington, waiting for her daughter to come home. Instead, the Miami Seaquarium forces her to entertain crowds in a shallow and barren tank that doesn’t come anywhere close to the minimum requirements of the Animal Welfare Act. She has been exploited in these inhumane conditions for 45 years.

It is well past time for Lolita’s suffering to come to an end, and the Animal Legal Defense Fund will continue to speak up for Lolita. Stay tuned for updates in our Lolita timeline, and read more about Lolita’s plight in her ALDF feature story.

31 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

ALDF LL.M. Scholar Award


Posted by Pamela D Hart, Director of Animal Law Program on March 20, 2015

The Animal Legal Defense Fund and Center for Animal Law Studies (CALS) are pleased to announce the ALDF LL.M. Scholar Award. The award provides tuition assistance toward the Animal Law LL.M. degree at Lewis & Clark Law School—the first and only postgraduate law degree program focused specifically on animal law.

lewis-and-clark-cc-keith-higa-article-image-500px

In 2008, the Animal Legal Defense Fund entered into an exciting collaboration with Lewis & Clark Law School to launch the Center for Animal Law Studies at Lewis & Clark. As a result of this collaboration, CALS has educated and supported law students and legal professionals in the rapidly developing field of animal law through classes, conferences, scholarships, and clinical opportunities.

The milestones that have been achieved at CALS have been nothing short of incredible, from the appointment of the first animal law dean to hiring the first full-time faculty member dedicated to an animal law clinic. These “firsts” complement an already impressive list of pioneering accomplishments at Lewis & Clark, including the formation of the first Student Animal Legal Defense Fund (SALDF) chapter, the first academic animal law conference, the first animal law journal, the first national animal law competitions, and launching of the first Animal Law LL.M. (Master of Laws) program in the world. The ALDF LL.M. Scholar Award is another of these “firsts” in support of the field of animal law.

ALDF has a longstanding commitment to animal legal education, and providing CALS with the funds to offer this new LL.M. award to an exceptional U.S. applicant is the next step in its continued support. This award is open to any recent law graduate or practicing attorney looking to immerse completely in specialized animal law courses. Whether your goal is to pursue teaching, build relationships within the animal law community, or work for an international animal welfare nonprofit, the LL.M. program is customizable to meet your educational and career goals.

Application submission guidelines.

4 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Humane Education and the Future of Compassion


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 19, 2015

Humane education is one way the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s mission to protect the lives and advance the interests of animals through the legal system can reach future generations. For example, at law schools across the nation, Student Animal Legal Defense Fund chapters (SALDF) do tremendous work in the field of animal law. But for younger children, and potential future SALDF members, HEART (Humane Education Advocates Reaching Teachers) initiates compassionate thinking about animals, and how they can be protected through the legal system. HEART’s brand-new resource guide aims to do just that.

kids-and-goats-article-image-500px

Have a Heart summer campers on a field trip to Catskill Animal Sanctuary.

 

Why is humane education so important? “Integrating humane education into the curriculum helps develop a culture of compassion,” says Meena Alagappan executive director of HEART. “Cultivating empathy in children is an effective way to prevent later violence toward animals,” she says. HEART is a national nonprofit that fosters compassion and respect for all living beings and the environment through empowering schoolchildren.

Each HEART lesson is designed by educational experts to provide age-appropriate ways to engage children with issues of compassion. With younger children, Meena notes, “it’s about getting them to relate to animals by understanding our similarities and learning interesting facts about the animals.”

Consider companion animal issues like abusive puppy mill breeding facilities and overcrowded shelters. In upper elementary math classes, HEART’s lessons help students measure how many animals result from one un-spayed dog and her mate in just two years—more than 600 puppies! Studying that exponential growth reinforces math skills while driving home the importance of animal protection laws. “Teachers love these activities,” Meena says, “because they help satisfy mandated learning standards and allow students to become more informed and responsible members of society.”

HEART’s 160-page compassionate resource guide includes 40 fun and memorable lessons like these for children in grades K-12. Lessons can be conducted in school or outside the classroom, at community centers, libraries, or camps. “We designed the curriculum with self-contained, accessible activities, so it’s suitable for not only teachers, but also concerned citizens who don’t have a formal background in teaching,” Meena explains.

“Behind Closed Doors” is a middle school lesson that engages students with the lives of egg-laying hens who are intensely confined in “battery cages.” Students compare the basic needs of dogs and cats with the needs of farmed animals and learn what “factory farm” means for chickens. Students are then given the opportunity to consider a law that would allow for larger cages for hens. They use their own critical thinking skills to present arguments and decide for themselves, as if they are members of Congress. These lessons also encourage civic participation in animal law issues. Students receive the core, empowering message that they can make a difference in the lives of animals.

Available on HEART’s website are more materials, along with informative and engaging videos to share. Download the free HEART resource guide and visit HEART on Facebook.

Meena Alagappan was formerly the chair of the American Bar Association’s Animal Law Committee and the NYC Bar Association’s Committee on Legal Issues Pertaining to Animals. She was educated at Cornell University, Northwestern Law School, and Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine.

No Comments  |  Leave A Comment

ALDF Speaks Up for Elephants at Woodland Park Zoo


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 17, 2015

elephant-cc-Razvan-Marescu-article-image-500px

Elephants Bamboo and Chai are suffering immensely in the Seattle-based Woodland Park Zoo. That’s why, today, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (with the pro bono assistance of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher) submitted a friend of the court brief in support of the right of Seattle taxpayers to see records about the conditions in which the elephants at Woodland Park Zoo are kept. Open records lawsuits are crucial to safeguarding the ability of the public to advocate for and protect animals in captivity.

ALDF’s amicus brief comes after a trial court denied a Seattle taxpayer these records. The trial court held the taxpayer was not entitled to the records because the zoo is not performing a governmental function, despite the fact that it receives millions of tax dollars every year from the city to operate the zoo. ALDF’s brief argues that the zoo is subject to the state’s Public Records Act as a government-funded entity.

The public has been increasingly outraged by conditions of captivity at the zoo. Last year, Watoto, a 45-year old African elephant, was euthanized after keepers found her suffering from arthritis so badly she couldn’t move to an upright position. Harmful management, longstanding neglect, and inhumane breeding practices have hurt elephants like Bamboo, Watoto, and Chai. These elephants suffer severe and chronic foot and joint problems, unexplained bleeding, and psychological damage.

Elephants are sensitive, intelligent, family-oriented, and social, and require wide expanses for their well-being. But that’s not what they get at the Woodland Park Zoo. Chai has been treated like a breeding machine: inseminated over 100 times, her only live birth, Hansa, died at just six years old. Chai and her fellow pachyderm prisoners demonstrate severe psychological suffering, compounded by pathetically small enclosures that prevent them from engaging in many natural behaviors.

For more than a century, the zoo used taxpayer dollars to support the cruel treatment of animals. The zoo’s origins lie in Seattle’s 1899 purchase of 200 acres on the southwest shore of Green Lake. From the beginning, the zoo has been fundamentally beholden to the people of Seattle. In 2010, ALDF filed a lawsuit on behalf of Seattle taxpayers against the zoo for cruel treatment of elephants. That lawsuit was dismissed by the court on standing, a procedural ground—but the court expressed concern about holding elephants captive and did not exonerate the zoo’s treatment of the elephants.

As cities begin to partially privatize their zoos, taxpayers risk losing their right to know how animals are treated in these facilities. This threat to transparency undermines public records laws, as ALDF argues in its brief. The Woodland Park Zoo has announced it will send the zoo’s two surviving elephants to the Oklahoma City Zoo—against the wishes of Seattle taxpayers, the majority of the city council, and the mayor, who all want to see Bamboo and Chai retired to a reputable sanctuary.

 

Tags:
32 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

2nd Annual Siskiyou Prize for Animal & Environmental Literature


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 11, 2015

siskiyou-prize-article-image-500px

Attention all authors, aspiring writers, and book lovers! One of our favorite presses, Ashland Creek Press—independent publishers of animal-themed and environmental-themed books—is announcing the 2nd annual Siskiyou Prize for New Environmental Literature. Ashland Creek has brought us books featured in the Animal Book Club like The Tourist Trail by John Yunker, Among Animals, and our recently reviewed Love & Ordinary Creatures, a novel by Gwyn Hyman Rubio.

The 2nd annual Siskiyou Prize will be awarded for an unpublished, book-length work of prose with environmental themes. This includes novels, memoirs, short story collections, and essay collections. Manuscripts are due September 1, 2015. The winner will receive $1,000, a four-week residency at PLAYA, and an offer of publication by Ashland Creek Press.

For this prize, “new environmental literature” refers to literary works that focus on the environment, animal protection, ecology, and wildlife. As book club members and ALDF supporters know, ALDF’s work on the overlap between animal protection and conservation efforts is strong. The links between animal agriculture, overpopulation, climate change, and habitat destruction form the basis of much of ALDF’s recent work, as well as our lawsuits to stop environmentally destructive and cruel wildlife killing contests, and our legal work to protect endangered species of birds, wolves, and marine mammals.

The Siskiyou Prize is named for the Klamath-Siskiyou region of northern California and southern Oregon, one of the most diverse eco-regions in the world. Considered a global center of biodiversity, the Klamath-Siskiyou region is an inspiring example of the importance of preservation. The prize seeks work that redefines our notions of environmentalism and sustainability, particularly when it comes to animal protection. The award will not go to books that support hunting, fishing, or eating animals. Under these basic guidelines, the prize is open to a wide range of writing with environmental and animal themes.

Prize judge Ann Pancake’s first novel, Strange as This Weather Has Been (Counterpoint 2007), features a southern West Virginia family devastated by mountaintop removal mining. Based on interviews and real events, the novel was one of Kirkus Reviews’s Top Ten Fiction Books of 2007, won the 2007 Weatherford Award, and was a finalist for the 2008 Orion Book Award. You can read about last year’s winner, selected by bestselling author Karen Joy Fowler, here. Karen’s amazing book We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves will feature in an Animal Book Club giveaway and review next month!

This prize is a tremendous way to celebrate and encourage more great writing on animal protection and conservation issues. For more information, visit SiskiyouPrize.com or AshlandCreekPress.com.

Tags:
No Comments  |  Leave A Comment

American Bar Association Protects Animals and Public Safety


Posted by Chris Green, ALDF Director of Legislative Affairs on March 9, 2015

lion-cc-michael-day-article-image-500px

On Monday February 9, the American Bar Association’s (ABA) house of delegates adopted Resolution 105 urging all legislative bodies to pass laws that prohibit:

“the possession, sale, breeding, import, or transfer of dangerous wild animals, such as big cats, bears, wolves, primates, and dangerous reptiles, in order to protect public safety and health, and to ensure the humane treatment and welfare of such animals.”

This means that the ABA puts its full endorsement behind the policy position that ownership of dangerous wild animals should be banned throughout the U.S. The ABA’s 400,000 nationwide membership and impeccable credibility for objectively pursuing justice and uniformity in the law makes this a significant step. Indeed, trade groups who promote exotic animal ownership already are lamenting passage of Resolution 105, stating: “Th[is] Report presents new problems for all exotic animal owners and keepers…”; “Without question, this Report will make its way into legislatures across the country…”; and, “This edict, adopted and approved by the ABA, will be a persuasive argument to politicians.”

As the current chair of the ABA-TIPS Animal Law Committee, I initiated Resolution 105 over three years ago, after dozens of dangerous wild and exotic animals were set loose in the rural Ohio community of Zanesville. The culprit, Terry Thompson, was a recently released convicted felon who had a history of animal cruelty. Reportedly distraught over separating from his wife, Thompson intentionally released more than 50 wild animals from his private menagerie and then took his own life on October 18, 2011.

When law enforcement officials arrived at the scene, they quickly had to choose between using lethal force to stop the animals or risking harm to human life. With nightfall approaching, the difficult decision was made, and over the next few hours police officers shot and killed 49 of the dangerous wild animals Thompson had released, including tigers, lions, bears, mountain lions, wolves, and a baboon.

At the time, Ohio was one of seven U.S. states that shockingly had absolutely no laws restricting private possession of dangerous wild and exotic animals. Bizarrely, while Ohio allowed ownership of grizzly bears, tigers, and venomous snakes with no oversight in 2011, possessing “pit bull-type” dogs was a crime. Both Ohio laws have since been changed through the committed work of animal advocates. But five U.S. states still allow anyone to own any dangerous animal without even so much as a permit. Those states are: Alabama, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina and Wisconsin. In addition to the obvious animal welfare concerns, privately owned exotic animals have killed more than 40 Americans over the past 25 years, including eight children—such as the 10-year old boy who was mauled to death by his aunt’s 400 pound Bengal tiger.

The ABA’s passage of Resolution 105 will greatly help us end the hazardous and harmful practice of exotic animal ownership, and prevent the future captivity of animals such as Tony the Truck Stop tiger and Ricky the bear. Thanks go out to all my colleagues in the ABA-TIPS Animal Law Committee for helping pass this important measure.

16 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

ALDF Supports a Fur Free West Hollywood


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 6, 2015

Today, ALDF has again stepped up for animals by speaking out in support of West Hollywood’s historic, first-in-the-country ban on the sale of products made from fur within city limits. Animal fur—from animals like foxes, minks, raccoon dogs, and many others—is cruelly produced, so the city decided to foster a cruelty free community by demanding that businesses sell faux fur or other cruelty-free alternatives. Unfortunately, a business called Mayfair House, which sells luxury animal fur products, has once again challenged the constitutionality of the city’s ban.

bunny-cc-cav-article-image-500px

The ban was passed in 2011, but did not go into effect until 2013. Last year, Mayfair House filed a lawsuit challenging the ban in federal court. In that case, the court allowed ALDF to submit a friend of the court (amicus curiae) brief in support of the city’s motion to dismiss the business’s lawsuit. A federal judge ruled that Mayfair House’s lawsuit was meritless and dismissed its suit with prejudice. But in June 2014, Mayfair House filed another lawsuit—this time in state court—challenging the validity of the law. The city was forced to defend its ordinance yet again, and ALDF will support the city’s efforts to reject the cruelty of fur by filing another amicus brief today.

ALDF has consistently supported West Hollywood’s effort to become the leader in groundbreaking, local animal protection ordinances. Indeed, more than 25 years ago, in 1989, the city declared itself to be a Cruelty Free Zone for Animals. Ordinances banning steel leghold traps and animal testing to make cosmetics soon followed. In 2003, the city banned the practice of non-therapeutic declawing of cats and other animals; seven other California cities followed that model in 2009. More recently, in 2010 West Hollywood banned the commercial sale of dogs and cats, in an effort to crackdown on the inhumane treatment of animals raised in puppy and kitten mills. And in 2013, West Hollywood banned the commercial display of animals, including circuses.

fur-coat-cc-Rachel-Elliott-article-image-500px

Does the city have the right to pass such humane laws? California’s state constitution protects a municipality’s ability to evolve in response to public values—like valuing the well-being of animals. Local control has proven effective in combatting animal cruelty because state and federal laws are inadequate. Animals depend on local governments, to fill that void. And precedent supports this: ten years ago California courts upheld the West Hollywood’s ban on the declawing of domestic cats after the California Veterinary Medical Association filed a lawsuit similar to Mayfair House’s.

West Hollywood meets its obligation to foster a Cruelty Free Zone with a ban on the sale of fur products. The agony animals on fur farms suffer is hard to swallow. The methods of confinement and slaughter are intentionally barbaric in order to preserve the integrity of a fox, rabbit, or chinchilla’s “pelt.” Animals are kept in small, filthy cages before being suffocated, electrocuted, gassed, or poisoned. In anal or vaginal electrocution, electrodes are attached to the animal’s face and genitals, and a heart attack is induced. Commonly—with no pain-killers and while fully conscious—animals are skinned alive.

ALDF’s support of West Hollywood is just one of a number of ways we are reaching out to protect animals and to defend humane, reasonable animal protection laws. Next month, the court will hear oral arguments on this issue, and ALDF will be there. Stay tuned for more in our fight against fur.

Tags: , ,
9 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Ringling to Phase Out Circus Elephants!


Posted by Carney Anne Small, ALDF Legislative Counsel on March 5, 2015

elephant-article-image-500px

“We’re not going to come… without our elephants,” said Stephen Payne, Ringling Bros.’ vice president of corporate communications, when the City of Los Angeles passed a ban on firepoker-like bullhooks that circuses use to dominate and control elephants. As public awareness has grown about the circus’ barbaric bullhook abuse, forcible separation of mothers and infant elephants, confinement of elephants in cramped boxcars for up to 100 hours at a time, nearly interminable chaining at performance venues, and use of elephants who are sick or suffering from painful conditions like arthritis, dozens of jurisdictions across the United States have banned the use of bullhooks or the use of exotic animals in traveling acts all together. Despite the clear shift in public opinion about the use of elephants and other animals in entertainment acts, Ringling has remained unyielding in its position that it will not end its use of elephants. Until today.

We have all hoped to see the elephants have their own Blackfish moment. And that moment appears to have arrived. On March 5, 2015, we all woke up to historic news that may not have been believable had it not been reported on virtually every major news network across the United States: Ringling Bros. announced that it is finally eliminating the use of elephants from its circus by 2018. In this earthshattering about-face maneuver, Ken Feld, the CEO of Ringling’s parent company, acknowledged the role that shifting public opinion and legislative efforts to ban bullhooks has played, and the circus’ need to adapt. While some groups have been critical of the efficacy of bullhook bans, this announcement by Ringling Bros. is a clear indication that the bans passed in Oakland, Los Angeles, Fulton County, and other localities across the U.S. have indeed influenced the $2 billion entertainment corporation’s decision to adapt and drop the elephant act.

This is a monumental step in the right direction, but our work on behalf of exotic animals in entertainment is not over yet. While we at Animal Legal Defense Fund are celebrating this historic victory for elephants, our efforts to pass legislation that will protect elephants, tigers, and other animals who are exploited in circuses and traveling acts will not end until all animal acts are a relic of the past.

11 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Commercialized Cruelty to Sled Dogs


Posted by Jennifer Molidor, ALDF Staff Writer on March 2, 2015

Around this time of year, ALDF is often asked: “are the Iditarod and other commercialized dogsledding events cruel to animals?” Every March—this year beginning March 7—the Iditarod is held in Alaska, and is the most famous example of commercialized dogsledding.

The annual Alaskan Iditarod is a grueling race through 1000 miles of the roughest terrain on earth, in temperatures that drop well below zero. Teams of dogs run, sometimes up to 100 miles a day, for 7-10 days. The human mushers compete for substantial financial rewards—even at the cost of injuring dogs. ALDF Founder and General Counsel Joyce Tischler explains:

Under the laws of some states, commercial dog sledding practices would be considered criminally cruel. In California, for example, the state criminal anti-cruelty law makes it a crime to inflict needless suffering or unnecessary cruelty upon an animal—including by overworking an animal. Conveniently for the Iditarod backers, Alaska’s anti-cruelty law conveniently exempts standard dog sledding practices and lets the industry define what is acceptable.

Since the Iditarod began decades ago, more than 140 dogs have died from heart attacks, pneumonia, muscle deterioration, dehydration, diarrhea, and spinal injuries. Some have been impaled on sleds, drowned, or accidentally strangled. Injured dogs are left alone at checkpoints, according to the Sled Dog Action Coalition. And big game animals, like elk and moose, who get in the way of the race, may be killed. During the off-season, sled dogs are generally kept chained to their doghouse in an outdoor kennel. Often, when the dogs are no longer profitable, they are killed.

And it’s not just Alaska—last year, a Colorado sled dog operator was charged with eight counts of animal cruelty after an investigation revealed starving, sick, and constantly tethered dogs left out in the cold. From the 1990s through 2014, the operator of Krabloonik Sled Dog Center was accused of “culling” his dogs by gunshot, as well as neglect, punching and beating dogs, and providing inadequate shelter.

Another commercial sled dog enterprise in Colorado at the Pawsatrak Racing Sled Dog Kennel also got in hot water for cruelty to animals. Authorities found six dogs dead on the premise and the rest were seized. A veterinarian who performed necropsies attested that the neglect of these dogs was chronic. Both owners were convicted of criminal animal cruelty.

In fact, cruelty charges have been filed against operators at sled dog operations all over the country, from Maine to Montana to New York—the abuse and neglect of sled dogs is horrific, pervasive, and chronic. Any time animals are used as objects to produce profits, in under-regulated industries, their well-being is in danger. Please do not support this inherently cruel industry.

30 Comments  |  Leave A Comment

Be a Partner in Protection!

Donate monthly to help animals.

or make a one-time gift »

Stay Connected

Sign up for Action Alerts.


Join Us

Follow ALDF on these networks:

Facebook Twitter YouTube Pinterest

Stay Connected

Sign up for Action Alerts.