Historic Lawsuit Targets Government Inaction on Climate Change, Violating Constitutional Right to Liberty
Lawsuit aims to ensure that the government protect the environment for the benefit of animals, thus making laws that are more protective of humans.
Contact: media@aldf.org
Washington, D.C. – The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit to protect Americans’ right to be let alone and compel federal government action on climate change. The plaintiffs include scientists, nature enthusiasts, and wildlife advocates who are no longer able to safely conduct their research or interact with nature because of the increased severity of wildfires, mudslides, and avalanches; disappearing snowpack and edible plants; and flash flooding, all of which have been altered due to damage caused by climate change.
“The Animal Legal Defense Fund is leading the charge on this groundbreaking claim because it is time to reevaluate the standards by which we protect our wildlands,” said Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “By safeguarding the necessary habitats to sustain wildlife, we will also be upholding Americans’ right to seek happiness, liberty and solitude in nature.”
The legal actions rely on the constitutionally established right to liberty, which courts have called the right to be let alone. As society becomes increasingly urbanized and digitally connected, the only place where the right to liberty truly exists is in America’s public lands. Anthropogenic climate change, however, is damaging once pristine natural areas, making them more dangerous and less navigable by humans and animals alike due to increased incidences of catastrophic wildfires, unexpected ice melts, and flash flooding that results in the terrain being unreachable. While humans have the potential to adapt with the help of science and technology, wildlife is less adaptable to these relatively rapid shifts in their environment.
The complaint uniquely connects decades of federal inaction to cut greenhouse gas emissions with the resulting decline in Americans’ ability to enjoy their right to be let alone in the wilderness due to the adverse effects of climate change on these natural places. The lawsuit details how the government has failed to adequately address greenhouse gas emissions while also providing institutional support, including direct and indirect subsidies using public funds for industries that are the greatest producers of these pollutants. For the plaintiffs, one of the most detrimental effects has been a shortened window in which conditions are suitable for accessing wildlands. As a result, areas that are more reachable are becoming increasingly crowded, reducing the level of solitude one can find while also speeding up the degradation of these lands.
The coalition of organizations and individuals involved in the lawsuit includes the Animal Legal Defense Fund; Seeding Sovereignty; Leslie Patten, a Wyoming-based author; Will Gadd, an accomplished outdoor adventure athlete; and Ian Petersen, an avid backpacker and Master’s student from Oregon.
The lawsuit names the Department of Interior, and the Department of Agriculture, among other agencies and Secretaries.
Related
-
Lawsuit Filed Demanding FDA Respond to Petitions Seeking to Ban Ractopamine
FDA’s approval for ractopamine relied primarily on safety studies conducted by the drugmaker.March 26, 2024 Press Release -
Tentative Settlement Reached in Texas Endangered Species Act Lawsuit
The Animal Legal Defense Fund and National Foundation for Rescued Animals, an animal exhibitor doing business as Tiger Creek Animal Sanctuary, have tentatively reached a settlement, pending the dismissal of the Endangered Species Act lawsuit filed in March 2022.February 28, 2024 Press Release -
Animal Legal Defense Fund Urges USDA to Revoke AWA License from Convicted Wildlife Trafficker
The Animal Legal Defense Fund submitted a complaint urging the USDA APHIS to investigate and revoke the AWA exhibitor license for Jason Clay.February 27, 2024 Press Release