The Exception to the General RulePosted by Scott Heiser, Director of ALDF's Criminal Justice Program on November 16th, 2009
I have long been an advocate of keeping animal abusers out of shelters and on more than one occasion I’ve criticized a judge for ordering a defendant convicted of animal abuse to work off community service hours at the local animal shelter. Shelters are low supervision environments where an offender is presented with both a large pool of potential new victims and a very low probability of getting caught… The “logic” of ordering an animal abuser to perform community service in a shelter is as about as sound as the “logic” of putting a child abuser to work in a daycare facility. While perhaps not quite as militant in my stance, by default, I have applied a derivative of this same line of reasoning to any offender—if you can’t be trusted to follow the law, then you can’t be trusted to care for the vulnerable and the voiceless.
However, as life has a way of proving, sometimes there are exceptions to the general rule. For example, when an offender whose crime is unrelated to any form of violent conduct (e.g., contempt of court for failing to pay fines on theft case), the idea of requiring an offender to work at an animal shelter can yield some very good outcomes. In Oregon, inmate-trustees from the Jackson County and Lincoln County jails have been assigned to work in local shelters with what appears to be great success.
While I will always err on the side of caution, these Jackson and Lincoln County programs leave room for recognizing that almost every rule has an exception.